Catalog
mattpocock/to-tickets

mattpocock

to-tickets

Break a plan, spec, or the current conversation into a set of tracer-bullet tickets, each declaring its blocking edges, published to the configured tracker (edges as text in one file per ticket locally, or native blocking links on a real tracker).

NewUpdated Oct 7, 2026

To Tickets

Break a plan, spec, or conversation into a set of tickets: tracer-bullet vertical slices, each declaring the tickets that block it.

The issue tracker and triage label vocabulary should have been provided to you. If not, tell the user to run /setup-matt-pocock-skills.

Process

1. Gather context

Work from whatever is already in the conversation context. If the user passes a reference (a spec path, an issue number or URL) as an argument, fetch it and read its full body and comments.

2. Explore the codebase (optional)

If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current state of the code. Ticket titles and descriptions should use the project's domain glossary vocabulary, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.

Look for opportunities to prefactor the code to make the implementation easier. "Make the change easy, then make the easy change."

3. Draft vertical slices

Break the work into tracer bullet tickets.

  • Each slice cuts a narrow but COMPLETE path through every layer (schema, API, UI, tests): vertical, NOT a horizontal slice of one layer
  • A completed slice is demoable or verifiable on its own
  • Each slice is sized to fit in a single fresh context window
  • Any prefactoring should be done first

Give each ticket its blocking edges: the other tickets that must complete before it can start. A ticket with no blockers can start immediately.

Wide refactors are the exception to vertical slicing. A wide refactor is one mechanical change (rename a column, retype a shared symbol) whose blast radius fans across the whole codebase, so a single edit breaks thousands of call sites at once and no vertical slice can land green. Don't force it into a tracer bullet; sequence it as expand–contract. First expand: add the new form beside the old so nothing breaks. Then migrate the call sites over in batches sized by blast radius (per package, per directory), each batch its own ticket blocked by the expand, keeping CI green batch to batch because the old form still exists. Finally contract: delete the old form once no caller remains, in a ticket blocked by every migrate batch. When even the batches can't stay green alone, keep the sequence but let them share an integration branch that all block a final integrate-and-verify ticket; green is promised only there.

4. Quiz the user

Present the proposed breakdown as a numbered list. For each ticket, show:

  • Title: short descriptive name
  • Blocked by: which other tickets (if any) must complete first
  • What it delivers: the end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work

Ask the user:

  • Does the granularity feel right? (too coarse / too fine)
  • Are the blocking edges correct: does each ticket only depend on tickets that genuinely gate it?
  • Should any tickets be merged or split further?

Iterate until the user approves the breakdown.

5. Publish the tickets to the configured tracker

Publish the approved tickets. How depends on the tracker /setup-matt-pocock-skills configured; the tickets are the same either way, only the shape of the blocking edges changes:

  • Local files → write one file per ticket under .scratch/<feature-slug>/issues/<NN>-<slug>.md, numbered from 01 in dependency order (blockers first). Each file's "Blocked by" lists the numbers/titles it depends on. Use the per-ticket file template below: one ticket per file, never a single combined file.
  • A real issue tracker (GitHub, Linear, …) → publish one issue per ticket in dependency order (blockers first) so each ticket's blocking edges can reference real identifiers. Use the platform's native blocking relationship where it has one; otherwise set each ticket's "Blocked by" to the blocking issues. If the source was an existing issue, make each ticket its sub-issue (tracker doc's operation). Apply the ready-for-agent triage label unless instructed otherwise; the tickets are agent-grabbable by construction.

Work the frontier: any ticket whose blockers are all done. For a purely linear chain that means top to bottom.

Do NOT close or modify any parent issue.

:

What to build: the end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work, from the user's perspective, not a layer-by-layer implementation list.

Blocked by: the numbers/titles of the tickets that gate this one, or "None (can start immediately)".

Status: ready-for-agent

  • Acceptance criterion 1
  • Acceptance criterion 2

Parent

A reference to the parent issue on the tracker (if the source was an existing issue, otherwise omit this section).

What to build

The end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work, from the user's perspective, not layer-by-layer implementation.

Acceptance criteria

  • Criterion 1
  • Criterion 2

Blocked by

  • A reference to each blocking ticket, or "None (can start immediately)". Omit this section when blockers were set as native edges.

In either form, avoid specific file paths or code snippets: they go stale fast. Exception: if a prototype produced a snippet that encodes a decision more precisely than prose can (state machine, reducer, schema, type shape), inline it and note briefly that it came from a prototype. Trim to the decision-rich parts, not a working demo, just the important bits.

Files2
2 files · 1.2 KB

Select a file to preview

Overall Score

82/100

Grade

B

Good

Grades are signals, not a certification. Always review a skill yourself before use.

Safety

80

Quality

85

Clarity

87

Completeness

75

Summary

A skill that breaks down plans, specs, or conversation context into tracer-bullet tickets with explicit blocking dependencies. It guides the agent through context gathering, codebase exploration, vertical-slice decomposition, user iteration, and publication to either local files or a real issue tracker (GitHub, Linear, etc.). The skill emphasizes complete end-to-end slices sized to fit a context window and teaches expand–contract patterns for wide refactors.

Detected Capabilities

file read (spec/issue content)codebase explorationfile write (local markdown tickets)issue tracker publication (GitHub, Linear, etc.)conversation analysisdependency graph generation

Trigger Keywords

Phrases that agents use to match this skill to user intent.

break plan into ticketsdecompose spec verticallytracer bullet breakdowngenerate blocking dependenciesvertical slice sizingexpand contract refactor

Risk Signals

INFO

File write to `.scratch/` directory for local ticket storage

Step 5: Publish the tickets
INFO

Outbound network requests to fetch issue content (GitHub, Linear APIs)

Step 1: Gather context, fetch reference
INFO

Dependency on external setup (`/setup-matt-pocock-skills` for tracker config)

Initial context setup

Use Cases

  • Break a project plan into agent-sized implementation tickets
  • Decompose a feature spec into vertical slices with blocking edges
  • Convert conversation context into structured work items for a tracker
  • Generate nested sub-issues from a GitHub/Linear parent issue
  • Plan refactors using expand–contract sequencing to keep CI green

Quality Notes

  • Excellent conceptual clarity: vertical-slice rules, expand–contract pattern, and tracer-bullet framing are well-explained with concrete rationale
  • Strong guidance on edge cases: recognizes when wide refactors break vertical slicing and prescribes an alternative sequencing strategy
  • Clear templates provided for both local files and issue tracker publication, reducing ambiguity
  • Good scaffolding: the skill instructs the agent to iterate with the user before publishing, catching decomposition errors early
  • Emphasizes domain vocabulary and ADR respect, showing integration with existing project practices
  • Well-structured process flow with clear decision points (optional codebase exploration, quiz before publishing)
  • Practical blocking-edge semantics: each ticket lists exactly what gates it, enabling parallelization
  • One potential ambiguity: the skill defers tracker-specific behavior to `/setup-matt-pocock-skills` setup, which is external; if that setup is missing or misconfigured, the agent may not know how to publish
Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001Analyzed: Oct 7, 2026

Reviews

Add this skill to your library to leave a review.

No reviews yet

Be the first to share your experience.

Version History

  1. v2.1

    Content updated

    ✦ AIRefines issue tracker publishing: uses platform native blocking relationships and sub-issue operations instead of free-text "Blocked by" field.

    2026-10-07

    LATEST
  2. v2.0

    Contract changed: description

    ✦ AILocal file ticket storage restructured to one file per ticket in .scratch directory; updated template format and guidance.

    triggering2026-09-09

    View This Version
  3. v1.0

    2026-07-09

    View This VersionInitial version

Use mattpocock/to-tickets in your dev environment

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...