Catalog
mattpocock/domain-modeling

mattpocock

domain-modeling

Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a CONTEXT.md, or recording or editing an ADR.

NewUpdated Sep 9, 2026

Domain Modeling

Actively build and sharpen the project's domain model as you design. This is the active discipline: challenging terms, inventing edge-case scenarios, and writing the glossary and decisions down the moment they crystallise. (Merely reading CONTEXT.md for vocabulary is not this skill: that's a one-line habit any skill can do. This skill is for when you're changing the model, not just consuming it.)

File structure

Most repos have a single context:

/
├── CONTEXT.md
├── docs/
│   └── adr/
│       ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
│       └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
└── src/

If a CONTEXT-MAP.md exists at the root, the repo has multiple contexts. The map points to where each one lives:

/
├── CONTEXT-MAP.md
├── docs/
│   └── adr/                          ← system-wide decisions
├── src/
│   ├── ordering/
│   │   ├── CONTEXT.md
│   │   └── docs/adr/                 ← context-specific decisions
│   └── billing/
│       ├── CONTEXT.md
│       └── docs/adr/

Create files lazily: only when you have something to write. If no CONTEXT.md exists, create one when the first term is resolved. If no docs/adr/ exists, create it when the first ADR is needed.

During the session

Challenge against the glossary

When the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in CONTEXT.md, call it out immediately. "Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y. Which is it?"

Sharpen fuzzy language

When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term. "You're saying 'account': do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things."

Discuss concrete scenarios

When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.

Cross-reference with code

When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you find a contradiction, surface it: "Your code cancels entire Orders, but you just said partial cancellation is possible. Which is right?"

Update CONTEXT.md inline

When a term is resolved, update CONTEXT.md right there. Don't batch these up: capture them as they happen. Use the format in CONTEXT-FORMAT.md.

CONTEXT.md should be totally devoid of implementation details. Do not treat CONTEXT.md as a spec, a scratch pad, or a repository for implementation decisions. It is a glossary and nothing else.

Offer ADRs sparingly

Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:

  1. Hard to reverse: the cost of changing your mind later is meaningful
  2. Surprising without context: a future reader will wonder "why did they do it this way?"
  3. The result of a real trade-off: there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons

If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in ADR-FORMAT.md.

Files4
4 files · 6.0 KB

Select a file to preview

Overall Score

87/100

Grade

A

Excellent

Grades are signals, not a certification. Always review a skill yourself before use.

Safety

92

Quality

86

Clarity

88

Completeness

81

Summary

This skill guides agents to actively build and maintain a project's domain model by challenging terminology, recording decisions, and keeping a glossary synchronized with code. It provides clear patterns for organizing CONTEXT.md files and ADR (Architecture Decision Record) documents, with disciplined rules for when to document and how to keep language precise.

Detected Capabilities

file readfile writedomain analysisterminology validation

Trigger Keywords

Phrases that agents use to match this skill to user intent.

domain modelcontext mappingarchitecture decisionsterminology conflictsglossarybounded contextsadrdomain language

Use Cases

  • Establish or refine domain language during architectural discussions
  • Document boundary decisions between microservices or bounded contexts
  • Resolve terminology conflicts between stakeholders and codebase
  • Create architecture decision records for hard-to-reverse choices
  • Maintain a living glossary as the domain model evolves
  • Stress-test domain relationships with concrete edge-case scenarios

Quality Notes

  • Clear, opinionated guidance with specific discipline rules
  • Excellent use of concrete file structure examples for both single and multi-context repos
  • Strong emphasis on laziness principle: only create files when actually needed
  • Well-defined constraints prevent anti-patterns (e.g., CONTEXT.md is glossary, not spec or scratch pad)
  • Supporting format templates (ADR-FORMAT.md, CONTEXT-FORMAT.md) are comprehensive and include clear examples
  • Good friction-point guidance: when to challenge terms, when to cross-reference code, when to offer ADRs
  • Three-part test for ADR creation (hard to reverse, surprising, real trade-off) prevents bloat
  • Rules for term definitions are practical (1-2 sentences, not implementation details)
  • Multi-context repo guidance with CONTEXT-MAP.md and relationship documentation is thorough
  • Provides decision heuristics ('hard to reverse', 'surprise without context') that are actionable for agents
Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001Analyzed: Sep 9, 2026

Reviews

Add this skill to your library to leave a review.

No reviews yet

Be the first to share your experience.

Version History

  1. v2.0

    Contract changed: description

    ✦ AINarrows activation context to codebase terminology and file editing (CONTEXT.md, ADR), away from generic domain-work requests.

    triggering2026-09-09

    LATEST
  2. v1.0

    2026-06-18

    View This VersionInitial version

Use mattpocock/domain-modeling in your dev environment

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...