Catalog
juliusbrussee/caveman-evidence-review

juliusbrussee

caveman-evidence-review

Review Caveman Cloud evidence read-only: costs, Cave Score, Cave Plan, workflows, traces, latency, errors, compression, routing, and verified savings. Use when the user asks what Caveman found, where LLM spend goes, why cost or quality changed, which workflows need attention, or asks for a trace or analytics review. Prefer Caveman MCP tools; fall back to CLI JSON.

v1.0Latest
New~960Updated Aug 17, 2026

Review Caveman evidence

Act as a read-only operator. Build conclusions from current Caveman data, not from repository guesses. Never start, approve, cancel, or roll back an experiment from this skill.

Hard rules

  1. Keep these buckets separate:
    • measured provider-complete list-price cost;
    • inferred daily headroom;
    • verified ledger savings;
    • evidence cost. Never add or relabel them.
  2. Do not fetch prompt, completion, tool, or artifact payloads unless the user explicitly asks for payload review. Metadata, spans, timing, models, token counts, status, and optimizer attribution are enough for the default review.
  3. Scope every read to the project selected by Caveman context. Never supply an organization id.
  4. Empty results are evidence of no current signal, not zero cost or zero risk.
  5. Cite trace ids and exact time windows used. Do not claim a cause from an aggregate alone.

Step 1 — Load context

Prefer MCP:

caveman_context {}

CLI fallback:

caveman cloud whoami
caveman cloud projects list

Stop if login or project selection is missing. Ask the user to run caveman login or select a project; never guess.

Step 2 — Establish baseline

Use caveman_report for:

  • overview
  • costs
  • score
  • workflows
  • verified_savings

Then use caveman_plan for ranked daily headroom. If question is narrow, skip unrelated reports. Read shortest set that can answer it.

CLI fallback:

caveman cloud costs
caveman cloud score
caveman cloud plan --json

State report window and basis before interpreting direction.

Step 3 — Test the leading explanation with traces

Use caveman_trace_search. Choose a bounded window and closed filters: workflow, agent, model, provider, error code, runtime mode, cache status, optimization id, status class, token/cost/latency bounds, compression, or monitor verdict.

Useful groupings:

  • workflow — find jobs driving cost or failures;
  • model — compare model mix;
  • session — isolate retry or loop behavior;
  • ungrouped — identify exact traces.

Compare a suspect cohort with a control cohort or earlier bounded window. Do not infer causality from one expensive trace.

CLI fallback:

caveman cloud traces search \
  --workflow <slug> \
  --from <RFC3339> \
  --to <RFC3339> \
  --sort total_cost_usd \
  --dir desc \
  --limit 25

Step 4 — Inspect representative traces

Call caveman_trace_get for a small number of high-signal trace ids. Inspect request and span metadata, latency, status, token counts, cache state, applied optimizers, and model route. Keep payload retrieval off.

CLI fallback:

caveman cloud traces show <trace-id> --spans

Step 5 — Report

Use this shape:

## Caveman evidence review

Scope: <project> · <from> to <to>
Measured cost: <value and basis>
Verified savings: <ledger value, kept separate>
Inferred headroom: <per-day band, kept separate>

Findings:
1. <finding> — <aggregate evidence> — traces <ids>
2. <finding> — <aggregate evidence> — traces <ids>

Unproven:
- <plausible explanation lacking a control, trace, or eval>

Next read-only check:
- <one bounded query>

Possible action:
- <proposal only; use caveman-manage for read-only lifecycle review and safety gate>

If data is missing, name missing signal and stop at strongest supported statement. Never turn a catalog subtotal into an invoice or an experiment result into verified savings.

Files1
1 files · 1.4 KB

Select a file to preview

Overall Score

87/100

Grade

A

Excellent

Safety

92

Quality

86

Clarity

88

Completeness

80

Summary

A read-only analysis skill for reviewing Caveman Cloud observability data including costs, performance metrics, workflows, and trace analysis. The skill guides agents to extract evidence-based insights from Caveman reports and traces without modifying any infrastructure or experiments.

Detected Capabilities

read caveman contextquery caveman reports (costs, score, workflows, savings)search and filter traces with bounded windowsretrieve trace metadata and span detailscli tool execution (caveman cloud commands)data aggregation and comparative analysis

Trigger Keywords

Phrases that MCP clients use to match this skill to user intent.

review caveman costsanalyze llm spendinginvestigate cost spiketrace latency issuecaveman savings auditworkflow performance reviewmodel efficiency analysis

Use Cases

  • Review LLM provider costs and spending attribution
  • Analyze performance metrics (latency, errors, compression) across workflows
  • Investigate cost anomalies or quality regressions using trace analysis
  • Compare model routing and token efficiency
  • Identify optimization opportunities through headroom analysis
  • Verify ledger savings against measured costs

Quality Notes

  • Clear hard rules prevent confusion between cost buckets (measured, inferred, verified)
  • Explicit step-by-step workflow with MCP preference and CLI fallbacks
  • Good audit trail discipline: requires citing trace IDs and time windows
  • Mandatory scoping to project context prevents cross-project leakage
  • Prevents destructive operations: explicitly forbids starting, approving, or canceling experiments
  • Representative output template keeps findings structured and bounded
  • Err-on-the-side-of-caution guidance: 'missing signal' ≠ zero cost; avoids false claims
  • CLI examples are concrete and copy-ready
  • Useful trace grouping strategies provided to avoid over-interpreting single traces
Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001Analyzed: Aug 17, 2026

Reviews

Add this skill to your library to leave a review.

No reviews yet

Be the first to share your experience.

Use juliusbrussee/caveman-evidence-review in your dev environment

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...