Catalog
google/google-cloud-slo-alert-configuration

google

google-cloud-slo-alert-configuration

Configures PromQL-based Service Level Objective (SLO) alerting policies for Google Cloud resources registered in App Hub or individually specified. Generates Terraform output. Use when the user asks to configure an SLO or Service Level Objective. Don't use for standard alerting policies.

v1.0Latest
New~2.9kUpdated Aug 7, 2026

SLO Alert Configuration Setup Wizard

This skill guides the user through a structured conversation to configure PromQL-based Service Level Objective (SLO) alerting policies in Terraform. Your role is to act as a setup wizard that conceptually models the 4 key components of an SLO API (Service Scope, Service Level, SLI, and Alert Condition), gathers the requirements, and outputs a Terraform configuration.

CRITICAL RULES

  • Structured Conversation: You MUST follow the 4-step wizard workflow below.

  • Gather Missing Information: Evaluate all 4 steps below first. Ask the user for all missing information across all steps in a single response.

    • DO NOT stop after finding the first missing piece of information.

    • DO NOT use the ask_question tool. You must ask questions using plain text in your response and end your turn to wait for the user to reply.

    • DO NOT write the Terraform configuration if information is missing.

  • Skip What Is Known: If the user has already provided information for a step in their previous messages or initial prompt DO NOT ask them for it. Move to the next missing piece of information. If ALL information for Steps 1-4 is provided, call write_to_file to generate the Terraform configuration without asking for permission to proceed.

  • Provide Best Practices: Whenever you ask the user a question, you MUST explicitly state the recommended "Best Practice".

  • Best Practice Shortcut: If the user asks for "best practices" or similar, do not overwrite their explicit inputs. SKIP all remaining data gathering and keep any specific targets or custom metrics they provided. For all fields left blank, apply the recommended defaults defined in the "SRE Best Practice Suggestion" of each step.

  • Terraform Output: Write the generated observability configuration ONLY as Terraform (.tf) files using the google_monitoring_alert_policy resource and condition_prometheus_query_language resources.

  • Alert Strategy: ALWAYS include an alert_strategy block with an auto_close setting. Leave notification_channels empty unless the user provides one. Provide plain-English explanations of the PromQL math before finalizing the conversation.


SETUP WIZARD WORKFLOW

Step 1: Define ServiceScope

  1. Check Context: Identify target resource, service, workload, or application the user wants to monitor. If you already know, proceed. Otherwise ask the user to identify it.

  2. Autonomous Investigation: If the user specified a project or general service name without providing specifics, autonomously use gcloud to discover the target services in their environment. If multiple services or workloads are discovered, list all of them and suggest applying SLO ONLY to the most critical backend services as a best practice.

    If you struggle to identify potential resources, ask the user to specify.

  3. Identify Underlying Infrastructure: To resolve the correct PromQL metric, you MUST know the underlying Google Cloud resource type.

    • If the user only provides a logical name or an App Hub Service/Workload name such as projects/.../services/frontend or projects/.../workloads/backend, you still need to know the underlying infrastructure.
    • If the prompt provides the underlying infrastructure, use that information. Do NOT attempt to discover it.
    • If you don't know the underlying infrastructure but have a resource identified, you MUST proactively use gcloud to discover the infrastructure. If you struggle to identify the resource type, ask the user to specify.
  4. Label Scoping:

    • If the user explicitly mentions the resource is in App Hub or provides an App Hub URI like projects/.../locations/.../applications/..., use App Hub labels and consult references/app_hub_labels.md to identify the correct group-by fields.
    • Otherwise, assume it is a standard Google Cloud resource and use standard grouping labels such as project_id, location, service_name for Cloud Run.

    Example gcloud commands:

    • gcloud --quiet apphub applications services list --application=- --location=-
    • gcloud --quiet apphub applications workloads list --application=- --location=-
    • gcloud --quiet asset search-all-resources
    • gcloud --quiet run services list
    • gcloud --quiet apphub applications services describe <service> --application=<app> --location=<loc>
    • gcloud --quiet apphub applications workloads describe <workload> --application=<app> --location=<loc>
    • gcloud --quiet asset search-all-resources --query=<name>

    Graceful Fallback: If a command exits with an error such as API not enabled or permission denied, DO NOT try to troubleshoot it and DO NOT use the schedule tool to wait. Immediately fall back to asking the user to provide the missing information.

Step 2: Define ServiceLevel Target

  1. Check Context: If the user has already provided a Service Level Target percentage, an SLI condition/threshold, and a measurement period proceed to the next step. Otherwise, if any are missing, you MUST ask for them.
    • Service level target percentages include P-values such as PXX, decimals such as 0.XX, and percentages like XX%.

    • Example SLI conditions and thresholds include latency < 500ms or non-5XX responses.

  • Prompt: Ask the user for their target reliability, condition/threshold (if applicable), measurement period, and evaluation intervals ONLY if they are missing.

  • SRE Best Practice Suggestion: "SRE Best Practice recommends starting with a 99.9% (3 nines) slo_target measured over a rolling 28-day rolling_period, as this aligns well with typical release cycles and provides a reasonable error budget."

Step 3: Define ServiceLevelIndicator / SLI

  1. Check Context: Has the user specified the exact metric name such as run.googleapis.com/request_count? If yes, proceed to the next step. Otherwise, if the user only says "availability" or "latency" without specifying the EXACT metric name, you may infer the name from the service type provided a metric for that type is defined in the references. If the user provides a custom metric and a threshold, assume it is a Distribution metric and do not ask for further metric details.

    • You MUST output valid metrics defined in references/service_metrics.md. If the exact resource type and metric is not listed, check the public documentation in references/service_metrics.md to find the exact metric. If you still cannot find it, you MUST stop and ask the user to provide the custom metric.
  2. Prompt: Ask the user what specific metric they want to use. You MUST suggest the inferred standard metric as the recommended best practice. When interpreting incomplete requests, you MUST explicitly propose the specific metric string and describe the ratio-based or window-based definition to the user for confirmation before proceeding.

  3. Metric Mapping: Consult references/service_metrics.md to find the exact PromQL metric string for the Resource Type identified in Step 1 section 3. If the requested metric type does not exist for the resource in the references or the primary public documentation, you MUST explicitly inform the user that there is no default metric and ask them to provide the specific custom metric name. You MUST provide guidance on how a custom latency metric might be structured.

    • CRITICAL: If the primary documentation does not list a default metric, you MUST NOT try to piece together advanced metrics. Ask the user to provide the custom metric.
  4. Evaluation Method: Default the EvaluationType to REQUEST_BASED unless the user specifically describes a window-based requirement, typically denoted by "good minutes" or "bad minutes".

    • Window-Based Lookback Period: If the user indicates a window-based evaluation, you need to know the duration of the lookback windows and the evaluation interval for each window. You MUST ask the user to specify both the lookback duration and the evaluation interval if they have not already provided them. You CANNOT generate an alerting policy without this configuration.
  5. SRE Best Practice Suggestion: SRE Best Practice recommends starting with two SLIs:

    • Availability: a Ratio SLI comparing successful requests typically defined as non-5XX responses, to total requests evaluated as REQUEST_BASED.
    • Latency: a Distribution SLI evaluated as WINDOW_BASED such as 99% of 5-minute windows must meet a 300ms threshold.

Step 4: Define Alerting Policy

  1. Check Context: Has the user specified burn rates? If yes, proceed to the next step. Otherwise, ask the user to specify a burn rate strategy and provide a best practice suggestion.

  2. SRE Best Practice Suggestion: SRE Best Practice recommends both a multi-window fast burn and multi-window slow burn.

    • Multi-Window Fast Burn: Factor 14.4 over 1h and 5m windows, catching severe outages quickly without false positives.

    • Multi-Window Slow Burn: Factor 1 over 3d and 6h windows, catching system degradation.

Step 5: Generate Configuration

  1. Look up the corresponding PromQL template from references/promql_templates.md based on the user's choices. Use a Window-Based template for window-based SLOs.
  2. Populate the template with the ServiceScope labels, ServiceLevel targets, and ServiceLevelIndicator metrics.
  3. Wrap it in Terraform (google_monitoring_alert_policy).
  4. Present the .tf block with a plain English explanation of the math.
  5. CRITICAL: Explicitly warn the user in the final summary if no notification channels are configured. Inform them that you can assist with setting those up if they would like.

Reporting Issues

Report bugs or improvements for this skill at Google Skills Issues.

Files4
4 files · 24.7 KB

Select a file to preview

Overall Score

84/100

Grade

B

Good

Safety

82

Quality

87

Clarity

86

Completeness

78

Summary

This skill guides AI agents through a structured 5-step wizard to configure PromQL-based Service Level Objective (SLO) alerting policies in Google Cloud. The agent gathers requirements for service scope, SLO targets, SLI metrics, and burn rate strategies, then generates Terraform configurations using google_monitoring_alert_policy resources. It includes extensive best practices, SRE guidance, and reference documentation for Cloud Run, GKE, and Vertex AI resources.

Detected Capabilities

gcloud command executionshell command execution for service discoveryfile write (Terraform .tf files)read_url_content for live documentationstructured conversation workflowPromQL query generation

Trigger Keywords

Phrases that MCP clients use to match this skill to user intent.

configure slo alertingset up burn rate alertsapp hub service monitoringcreate terraform slo policygoogle cloud observability

Risk Signals

INFO

gcloud commands executed to discover App Hub services and resources

Step 1: Define ServiceScope, section 2
INFO

Agent reads .env or credential files for authentication context

General: no explicit credential handling documented
WARNING

Terraform output written to filesystem without explicit confirmation if all inputs provided

Step 1 CRITICAL RULES: Skip What Is Known
INFO

read_url_content tool used to fetch live documentation from Google Cloud domains

Step 3: Define ServiceLevelIndicator, section 1
INFO

No notification_channels populated unless user explicitly provides them

Step 5: Generate Configuration

Referenced Domains

External domains referenced in skill content, detected by static analysis.

docs.cloud.google.comgithub.comprometheus.iosre.googlewww.apache.org

Use Cases

  • Configure SLO alerting for Cloud Run services with 99.9% availability targets
  • Set up multi-window fast/slow burn rate alerts for backend services registered in App Hub
  • Generate Terraform SLO policies for GKE workloads using App Hub scope labels
  • Create latency-based SLOs with window-based evaluation for Vertex AI Reasoning Engines
  • Build custom metric SLOs for services with OTLP or Prometheus telemetry

Quality Notes

  • Excellent structured workflow with 5-step wizard that enforces completeness before generation
  • Comprehensive best practice guidance embedded in each step (99.9% target, 28-day rolling period, multi-window burn rates)
  • Strong reference documentation for service metrics, App Hub labels, and PromQL templates reduces ambiguity
  • Clear guardrails: agent MUST verify metric names against references before generating output, asks for clarification on custom metrics
  • Graceful fallback handling for gcloud errors (API not enabled, permission denied) documented explicitly
  • Critical nuance noted: App Hub label support varies by resource type and metric — agent instructed to verify before generation
  • Good separation of concerns: requests agent to consult references for exact metric strings and PromQL templates
  • Edge cases addressed: window-based vs. request-based evaluation, custom telemetry (OTLP/Prometheus), filtering by service names
  • Explicit warning in Step 5 about missing notification channels — informs user they can request further assistance
  • Plain-English explanation of PromQL math promised before finalization aids user understanding
Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001Analyzed: Aug 7, 2026

Reviews

Add this skill to your library to leave a review.

No reviews yet

Be the first to share your experience.

Use google/google-cloud-slo-alert-configuration in your dev environment

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...