Catalog
github/eyeball

github

eyeball

Document analysis with inline source screenshots. When you ask Copilot to analyze a document, Eyeball generates a Word doc where every factual claim includes a highlighted screenshot from the source material so you can verify it with your own eyes.

global
New~1.6k
v1.0Saved Jun 26, 2026

Eyeball

Analyze documents with visual proof. When activated, Eyeball produces a Word document on the user's Desktop where every factual assertion includes an inline screenshot from the source material with the cited text highlighted in yellow.

Activation

When the user invokes this skill (e.g., "use eyeball", "run eyeball on this", "eyeball this document"), respond with:

Eyeball is active. I'll analyze the document and produce a Word doc with inline source screenshots so you can verify every claim with your own eyes.

Then follow the workflow below.

Supported Sources

  • Local files: Word documents (.docx, .doc), PDFs (.pdf), RTF files
  • Web URLs: Any publicly accessible web page

Tool Location

The Eyeball Python utility is located at:

<plugin_dir>/skills/eyeball/tools/eyeball.py

To find the actual path, run:

find ~/.copilot/installed-plugins -name "eyeball.py" -path "*/eyeball/*" 2>/dev/null

If not found there, check the project directory or the user's home directory for the eyeball repo.

First-Run Setup

Before first use, check that dependencies are installed:

python3 <path-to>/eyeball.py setup-check

If anything is missing, install the required dependencies:

pip3 install pymupdf pillow python-docx playwright
python3 -m playwright install chromium

On Windows, also install pywin32 for Word automation:

pip install pywin32

Workflow

Follow these steps exactly. The order matters.

Step 1: Read the source text

Before writing any analysis, extract and read the full text of the source document:

python3 <path-to>/eyeball.py extract-text --source "<path-or-url>"

Read the output carefully. Identify actual section numbers, headings, page numbers, and key language.

CRITICAL: Do not skip this step. Do not write analysis based on assumptions about how the document is structured. Read the actual text.

Step 2: Write analysis with exact citations

For each point in your analysis, you must:

  1. Reference the correct section number as it appears in the document (e.g., "Section 9" not "Section 8" because you assumed the numbering).
  2. Reference the correct page number where the section appears in the extracted text.
  3. Select anchors that are verbatim phrases from the source that directly support your claim.

Step 3: Select anchors correctly

This is the most important step. Anchors determine what gets highlighted in the screenshots.

DO:

  • Use verbatim phrases from the source text that directly support your assertion
  • Use multiple anchors to span the full range of text the reader should see
  • Use specific, uncommon phrases that appear only where you intend

DO NOT:

  • Use generic topic labels (e.g., "Confidentiality") that appear throughout the document
  • Use section titles alone when they appear as cross-references elsewhere
  • Use single common words that match in many places

Examples:

WRONG -- uses a generic topic label that matches everywhere:

{"anchors": ["User-Generated Content"], "target_page": 8}

RIGHT -- uses the specific language that supports the claim:

{"anchors": ["retain ownership", "Ownership of Content, Right to Post"], "target_page": 8}

WRONG -- section title appears as a cross-reference on earlier pages:

{"anchors": ["LIMITATION OF LIABILITY"]}

RIGHT -- includes the section number for precision, targets the correct page:

{"anchors": ["12. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY", "INDIRECT", "CONSEQUENTIAL"], "target_page": 13}

Step 4: Build the analysis document

Construct a JSON array of sections and call the build command:

python3 <path-to>/eyeball.py build \
  --source "<path-or-url>" \
  --output ~/Desktop/<title>.docx \
  --title "Analysis Title" \
  --subtitle "Source description" \
  --sections '[
    {
      "heading": "1. Section Title",
      "analysis": "Your analysis text here. Reference Section X on page Y...",
      "anchors": ["verbatim phrase 1", "verbatim phrase 2"],
      "target_page": 5,
      "context_padding": 40
    },
    {
      "heading": "2. Another Section",
      "analysis": "More analysis...",
      "anchors": ["exact quote from source"],
      "target_pages": [10, 11],
      "context_padding": 50
    }
  ]'

Section object fields:

  • heading (required): Section heading in the output document
  • analysis (required): Your analysis text
  • anchors (required): List of verbatim phrases from the source to search for and highlight
  • target_page (optional): Single page number (1-indexed) to search on
  • target_pages (optional): List of page numbers to search across (screenshots stitched vertically)
  • context_padding (optional): Padding in PDF points above/below the anchor region (default: 40). Increase for more context.

Step 5: Deliver the output

Save the output to the user's Desktop. Tell the user the filename and that they can open it to verify each claim against the highlighted source screenshots.

Self-Check Before Delivery

Before saving the final document, mentally verify:

  1. Does each section's analysis text reference the correct section number from the source?
  2. Are the anchors verbatim phrases that appear on the target page?
  3. Does each anchor directly support the claim in the analysis, not just relate to the same topic?
  4. If the screenshot doesn't match the analysis, is the analysis wrong or is the anchor wrong? Fix whichever is incorrect.

Notes

  • The output document includes highlighted screenshots that are dynamically sized. If you provide multiple anchors, the screenshot expands to cover all of them.
  • When a search term is not found, the output document will note this. If this happens, the anchor was likely not verbatim enough. Adjust and rebuild.
  • For web pages, Playwright renders the page to PDF first. The resulting page numbers may differ from what you see in a browser. Use the extracted text output (step 1) to determine correct page numbers.
  • If the user has already provided the source text or you have already read it in the current conversation, you can skip step 1. But always verify section numbers and page references against the actual text before writing analysis.
Files2
2 files · 28.9 KB

Select a file to preview

Overall Score

88/100

Grade

A

Excellent

Safety

89

Quality

87

Clarity

89

Completeness

85

Summary

Eyeball generates Word documents with inline screenshots from source materials (PDFs, Word documents, web pages) where every factual claim is paired with a highlighted excerpt from the source. The skill guides an agent through a five-step workflow: read the source text, write precise citations, select verbatim anchors, build a Word document with embedded screenshots, and deliver the output to the user's Desktop.

Detected Capabilities

file writePDF renderingweb page renderingimage processingfile readingprocess executionWord document generation

Trigger Keywords

Phrases that MCP clients use to match this skill to user intent.

verify claims with screenshotsannotate document sourceshighlight source passagesaudit trail documentationfact-check with proof

Risk Signals

INFO

Desktop file writes via user home directory expansion

SKILL.md, Step 5; eyeball.py, build_analysis_doc() and _resolve_path()
INFO

External network access via Playwright for web page rendering

eyeball.py, render_url_to_pdf() calls playwright.sync_api
INFO

Third-party tool invocation (LibreOffice, Microsoft Word) for document conversion

eyeball.py, convert_to_pdf() and related functions
INFO

Temporary directory creation for document processing

eyeball.py, _convert_with_libreoffice() uses tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()

Use Cases

  • Verify claims in long documents with visual proof
  • Create audit-ready analysis documents with source citations
  • Generate annotated PDFs with highlighted passages
  • Analyze contracts or legal documents clause by clause
  • Create fact-checked document summaries with source screenshots

Quality Notes

  • Well-structured workflow with explicit step-by-step instructions that guide an agent through document analysis
  • Excellent documentation of the anchor selection process with concrete right/wrong examples, critical for correctness
  • Comprehensive coverage of supported document formats (Word, PDF, RTF, web URLs)
  • Clear self-check section before delivery helps prevent errors
  • Robust Python implementation with proper error handling, multi-platform support (macOS, Windows, Linux), and fallbacks for document conversion (Word → LibreOffice)
  • Tool location discovery instructions provided; setup-check command helps users verify dependencies before use
  • Well-documented API for the build command with clear parameter descriptions
  • Notes section addresses edge cases (web page page numbering, search term matching)
  • Minor: Some instructions could be more explicit about handling anchor not found errors in the analysis phase
Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001Analyzed: Jun 26, 2026

Reviews

Add this skill to your library to leave a review.

No reviews yet

Be the first to share your experience.

Add github/eyeball to your library

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...