Catalog
getsentry/triage-frontend-issues

getsentry

triage-frontend-issues

Triage new issues in the Sentry `javascript` project by archiving non-actionable noise. Use when asked to "triage issues", "triage the javascript project", "archive non-actionable issues", "triage new frontend issues", or "clean up the sentry/javascript queue". Operates only on the sentry/javascript project, only archives (never resolves), and always archives with `untilEscalating`.

NewUpdated Sep 30, 2026

Triage Frontend Issues

Archive non-actionable noise from the sentry/javascript issue queue: only archive, always untilEscalating, always with a stated reason. Issues that look actionable in our code, or that you cannot confidently classify, must be skipped.

Hard Rules

These rules override anything else. Do not relax them.

  1. Project scope. Only operate on organizationSlug=sentry, project slug javascript. If asked to triage a different project, stop and ask the user to confirm.
  2. Archive only. The only status mutation permitted is status=ignored. Never resolve, never unresolve, never assign, never delete, never bulk-update fields other than status.
  3. Always untilEscalating. Use ignoreMode=untilEscalating. Never use forever, forDuration, untilOccurrenceCount, or untilUserCount. If the user asks for a different mode, stop and have them archive that issue manually — this skill does not perform non-escalating archives.
  4. Always include a reason. The reason must be a short, factual sentence naming the category from references/archive-criteria.md (e.g., "Third-party library noise — echarts internals; not actionable in our code").
  5. Never touch issues outside the unresolved queue. Skip anything with status of resolved, ignored, or reprocessing.
  6. Never archive without confirmation. Build a full plan, show it to the user, wait for explicit approval before calling update_issue. A single approval covers the displayed plan only; new batches need new approval.
  7. When in doubt, skip. If an issue could plausibly be a real bug in our code, do not archive it. Surface it as needs-human in the plan with a one-line note.

Prerequisites

  • Sentry MCP authenticated via mcp.sentry.dev. Required tools: search_issues, get_sentry_resource, update_issue.
  • If update_issue is not available, stop and ask the user to authenticate the Sentry MCP server.

Inputs

$ARGUMENTS is one of:

Input shape Meaning
Sentry issue URL (https://sentry.sentry.io/issues/JAVASCRIPT-…) Triage that single issue.
Issue short ID (JAVASCRIPT-…) Triage that single issue.
Sentry issue query (contains a colon, e.g. is:unresolved firstSeen:-24h) Use as the search query.
Empty Use the default triage queue: is:unresolved is:unassigned firstSeen:-7d, sort new, limit 50.

If $ARGUMENTS is ambiguous, ask the user to clarify before searching.

Workflow

1. Load the queue

For single-issue input:

  • Call get_sentry_resource(url=<issue-url>) or get_sentry_resource(resourceType='issue', organizationSlug='sentry', resourceId=<shortId>).
  • Confirm Project is the javascript frontend project. If not, stop.

For query/default input:

  • Call search_issues(organizationSlug='sentry', projectSlugOrId='javascript', query=<query>, sort='new', limit=50).
  • Then call get_sentry_resource for each result in parallel to get culprit, substatus, assignee, and stack-frame hints (the search response omits some fields).

Skip immediately if any of these are true on an issue:

  • status is not unresolved (already archived, resolved, or in reprocessing).
  • assignedTo is set to a human (someone is already owning it).
  • assignedTo is set to a team other than frontend/issues and the issue looks team-specific (let the owning team triage).

2. Classify each issue

Read references/archive-criteria.md for the category taxonomy with recognition heuristics and examples. For each candidate issue, produce one of:

Decision Meaning
archive Matches a documented category; include the category name in the reason.
skip Could be a real bug in our code, or insufficient evidence; do not archive.
needs-human Looks like noise but doesn't cleanly fit a category, or volume is unusually high; flag for user review.

When evaluating, weight these signals (in this order):

  1. Top non-Sentry-SDK frame. If the top in-app frame is in node_modules/, chrome-extension://, a third-party host, or <unknown>, this is a strong archive signal.
  2. Title pattern. Many archives are recognizable from the title alone (see criteria reference).
  3. Volume is not a veto. Some high-volume issues (10k+ events, thousands of users) are still archive-worthy if the top frame is third-party. Volume alone never forces archive either.
  4. Recency. Single-event issues older than 30 days with no recurrence are usually noise.
  5. Customer org spread. If events come from one customer subdomain only (check customerDomain.subdomain tag), it is likely customer-environment noise.

3. Build the plan

Output one Markdown table to the user, in this exact shape:

## Triage plan — sentry/javascript (<N> candidates)

| # | Issue | Title | Volume | Decision | Category | Reason |
|---|-------|-------|--------|----------|----------|--------|
| 1 | [JAVASCRIPT-XXXX](url) | TypeError: ... | 12e/3u | archive | browser-api-noise | Browser clipboard permission denied; not actionable. |
| 2 | [JAVASCRIPT-YYYY](url) | <unknown> | 4945e/123u | needs-human | — | High volume, no title — please review before archiving. |
| 3 | [JAVASCRIPT-ZZZZ](url) | ZodError: ... | 360e/132u | skip | — | Schema validation failure in our code; looks actionable. |

Then summarize counts: N archive / M skip / K needs-human. End with:

Reply `apply` to archive the N issues marked `archive`, `apply N,M,...` to archive a subset, or `cancel` to take no action.

4. Apply on approval

When the user replies apply (or apply <subset>):

For each issue in the approved set, call:

update_issue(
  organizationSlug='sentry',
  issueId=<shortId>,
  status='ignored',
  ignoreMode='untilEscalating',
  reason=<category-tagged reason from the plan>,
)

Run these sequentially (not in parallel). If a call fails, log the failure, continue with the remaining issues, and report the failed IDs in step 5.

If the user replies cancel or asks to modify the plan, do NOT call update_issue. If they reply with edits ("change row 2 to skip"), rebuild the plan and re-confirm.

5. Report

After applying, output:

## Triage report

- Archived: N
- Skipped: M
- Needs human review: K
- Failures: F (with issue IDs)

<details><summary>Archived issues</summary>

- JAVASCRIPT-XXXX — <reason>
- ...

</details>

Recovery

  • If update_issue fails on one item, log the failure and continue with the rest. Report failed IDs at the end.
  • If the user notices a wrong archive, the user can unarchive it themselves in Sentry. The skill never reverses its own actions automatically.
  • If the user asks "redo the plan with these tweaks" mid-flow, regenerate the plan from scratch — do not assume the previous plan still applies.

Example reasons (use this voice)

  • Third-party library noise — echarts tooltip; not actionable in our code.
  • Browser API permission noise — Clipboard writeText denied by user agent.
  • Customer-environment proxy interference — 200 response treated as error (HTML body from corporate proxy).
  • Transient backend 5xx — InternalServerError on /api/0/organizations/.../events-meta/; backend transient.
  • Test/synthetic event — smoke test or security probe, not production traffic.
  • Wrong project — Prisma/Python error mis-routed to frontend project.
  • Single-event fluke — 1 event, 1 user, no recurrence in 30+ days.
  • Browser extension noise — ReferenceError for extension-injected global (DarkReader/WeixinJSBridge).
Files3
3 files · 23.9 KB

Select a file to preview

Overall Score

88/100

Grade

A

Excellent

Grades are signals, not a certification. Always review a skill yourself before use.

Safety

92

Quality

87

Clarity

89

Completeness

82

Summary

Triage Frontend Issues is a specialized Sentry issue archiving skill that reads non-actionable issues from the sentry/javascript project and archives them (only) with an `untilEscalating` mode and documented reasons. It operates through Sentry MCP with strict guardrails: archive-only (never resolve or assign), requires explicit user approval before mutations, and classifies issues against a detailed taxonomy of noise categories (third-party library errors, browser API failures, test events, etc.). The skill is well-scoped to a single project, well-documented with clear decision logic, and includes comprehensive reference material.

Detected Capabilities

read sentry issue metadata via MCP (search, get_sentry_resource)archive issues with ignoreMode parameter (update_issue)read local reference files (archive-criteria.md)parse Sentry issue URLs and short IDsfilter issues by status, assignee, and time window

Trigger Keywords

Phrases that agents use to match this skill to user intent.

triage frontend issuesarchive sentry noiseclean unresolved queuesentry javascript projectclassify issue typebulk archive plan

Risk Signals

INFO

Sentry MCP authentication via mcp.sentry.dev required but not validated at runtime; skill stops gracefully if unavailable

SKILL.md: Prerequisites section
INFO

Skill references external sentry.sentry.io and www.apache.org domains; both are first-party/standards references

Frontmatter, LICENSE
INFO

Hard rule forbids all status changes except archive; mutations limited to single field (status=ignored)

SKILL.md: Hard Rules section

Referenced Domains

External domains referenced in skill content, detected by static analysis.

sentry.sentry.iowww.apache.org

Use Cases

  • Archive non-actionable noise from the sentry/javascript queue to reduce alert fatigue
  • Classify new unresolved Sentry issues by root cause (third-party library, browser quirk, test event, etc.)
  • Triage a single issue URL or short ID to decide whether to archive it
  • Build and execute a bulk archive plan with user confirmation before any mutations
  • Establish a repeatable workflow for weekly/daily queue cleanup using consistent criteria

Quality Notes

  • Excellent: Hard rules are explicit and non-negotiable, clearly documented at the top of SKILL.md
  • Excellent: Workflow is step-by-step with clear decision points (load queue, classify, build plan, apply on approval, report)
  • Excellent: Comprehensive archive-criteria.md taxonomy with 9 categories, recognition heuristics, examples, and negative criteria (what NOT to archive)
  • Excellent: Requires explicit user approval before calling update_issue; enables review and partial applies (apply N,M,...)
  • Excellent: SPEC.md documents intent, scope, evidence model, and known limitations — helpful for maintenance
  • Excellent: Examples of archive reasons show consistent voice and specificity
  • Strong: Decision matrix in archive-criteria.md clarifies high-confidence vs. needs-human boundaries
  • Strong: Sequential execution of update_issue prevents partial state corruption on failure
  • Minor: Plan table format is well-defined but hardcoding the shape may limit flexibility if new columns emerge
  • Minor: Recovery section documents failure handling but assumes user can manually unarchive — appropriate for this domain
Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001Analyzed: Sep 30, 2026

Reviews

Add this skill to your library to leave a review.

No reviews yet

Be the first to share your experience.

Version History

  1. v2.0

    Contract changed: allowed-tools

    ✦ AIAllowed tools contract refined: removed Read tool from permitted set.

    tool access2026-09-30

    LATEST
  2. v1.0

    2026-07-11

    View This VersionInitial version

Use getsentry/triage-frontend-issues in your dev environment

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...