Catalog
getsentry/triage-frontend-issues

getsentry

triage-frontend-issues

Triage new issues in the Sentry `javascript` project by archiving non-actionable noise. Use when asked to "triage issues", "triage the javascript project", "archive non-actionable issues", "triage new frontend issues", or "clean up the sentry/javascript queue". Operates only on the sentry/javascript project, only archives (never resolves), and always archives with `untilEscalating`.

global
Allowed Tools
Readmcp__sentry__search_issuesmcp__sentry__get_sentry_resourcemcp__sentry__update_issue
New~2.0k
v1.0Saved Jul 11, 2026

Triage Frontend Issues

Archive non-actionable noise from the sentry/javascript issue queue: only archive, always untilEscalating, always with a stated reason. Issues that look actionable in our code, or that you cannot confidently classify, must be skipped.

Hard Rules

These rules override anything else. Do not relax them.

  1. Project scope. Only operate on organizationSlug=sentry, project slug javascript. If asked to triage a different project, stop and ask the user to confirm.
  2. Archive only. The only status mutation permitted is status=ignored. Never resolve, never unresolve, never assign, never delete, never bulk-update fields other than status.
  3. Always untilEscalating. Use ignoreMode=untilEscalating. Never use forever, forDuration, untilOccurrenceCount, or untilUserCount. If the user asks for a different mode, stop and have them archive that issue manually — this skill does not perform non-escalating archives.
  4. Always include a reason. The reason must be a short, factual sentence naming the category from references/archive-criteria.md (e.g., "Third-party library noise — echarts internals; not actionable in our code").
  5. Never touch issues outside the unresolved queue. Skip anything with status of resolved, ignored, or reprocessing.
  6. Never archive without confirmation. Build a full plan, show it to the user, wait for explicit approval before calling update_issue. A single approval covers the displayed plan only; new batches need new approval.
  7. When in doubt, skip. If an issue could plausibly be a real bug in our code, do not archive it. Surface it as needs-human in the plan with a one-line note.

Prerequisites

  • Sentry MCP authenticated via mcp.sentry.dev. Required tools: search_issues, get_sentry_resource, update_issue.
  • If update_issue is not available, stop and ask the user to authenticate the Sentry MCP server.

Inputs

$ARGUMENTS is one of:

Input shape Meaning
Sentry issue URL (https://sentry.sentry.io/issues/JAVASCRIPT-…) Triage that single issue.
Issue short ID (JAVASCRIPT-…) Triage that single issue.
Sentry issue query (contains a colon, e.g. is:unresolved firstSeen:-24h) Use as the search query.
Empty Use the default triage queue: is:unresolved is:unassigned firstSeen:-7d, sort new, limit 50.

If $ARGUMENTS is ambiguous, ask the user to clarify before searching.

Workflow

1. Load the queue

For single-issue input:

  • Call get_sentry_resource(url=<issue-url>) or get_sentry_resource(resourceType='issue', organizationSlug='sentry', resourceId=<shortId>).
  • Confirm Project is the javascript frontend project. If not, stop.

For query/default input:

  • Call search_issues(organizationSlug='sentry', projectSlugOrId='javascript', query=<query>, sort='new', limit=50).
  • Then call get_sentry_resource for each result in parallel to get culprit, substatus, assignee, and stack-frame hints (the search response omits some fields).

Skip immediately if any of these are true on an issue:

  • status is not unresolved (already archived, resolved, or in reprocessing).
  • assignedTo is set to a human (someone is already owning it).
  • assignedTo is set to a team other than frontend/issues and the issue looks team-specific (let the owning team triage).

2. Classify each issue

Read references/archive-criteria.md for the category taxonomy with recognition heuristics and examples. For each candidate issue, produce one of:

Decision Meaning
archive Matches a documented category; include the category name in the reason.
skip Could be a real bug in our code, or insufficient evidence; do not archive.
needs-human Looks like noise but doesn't cleanly fit a category, or volume is unusually high; flag for user review.

When evaluating, weight these signals (in this order):

  1. Top non-Sentry-SDK frame. If the top in-app frame is in node_modules/, chrome-extension://, a third-party host, or <unknown>, this is a strong archive signal.
  2. Title pattern. Many archives are recognizable from the title alone (see criteria reference).
  3. Volume is not a veto. Some high-volume issues (10k+ events, thousands of users) are still archive-worthy if the top frame is third-party. Volume alone never forces archive either.
  4. Recency. Single-event issues older than 30 days with no recurrence are usually noise.
  5. Customer org spread. If events come from one customer subdomain only (check customerDomain.subdomain tag), it is likely customer-environment noise.

3. Build the plan

Output one Markdown table to the user, in this exact shape:

## Triage plan — sentry/javascript (<N> candidates)

| # | Issue | Title | Volume | Decision | Category | Reason |
|---|-------|-------|--------|----------|----------|--------|
| 1 | [JAVASCRIPT-XXXX](url) | TypeError: ... | 12e/3u | archive | browser-api-noise | Browser clipboard permission denied; not actionable. |
| 2 | [JAVASCRIPT-YYYY](url) | <unknown> | 4945e/123u | needs-human | — | High volume, no title — please review before archiving. |
| 3 | [JAVASCRIPT-ZZZZ](url) | ZodError: ... | 360e/132u | skip | — | Schema validation failure in our code; looks actionable. |

Then summarize counts: N archive / M skip / K needs-human. End with:

Reply `apply` to archive the N issues marked `archive`, `apply N,M,...` to archive a subset, or `cancel` to take no action.

4. Apply on approval

When the user replies apply (or apply <subset>):

For each issue in the approved set, call:

update_issue(
  organizationSlug='sentry',
  issueId=<shortId>,
  status='ignored',
  ignoreMode='untilEscalating',
  reason=<category-tagged reason from the plan>,
)

Run these sequentially (not in parallel). If a call fails, log the failure, continue with the remaining issues, and report the failed IDs in step 5.

If the user replies cancel or asks to modify the plan, do NOT call update_issue. If they reply with edits ("change row 2 to skip"), rebuild the plan and re-confirm.

5. Report

After applying, output:

## Triage report

- Archived: N
- Skipped: M
- Needs human review: K
- Failures: F (with issue IDs)

<details><summary>Archived issues</summary>

- JAVASCRIPT-XXXX — <reason>
- ...

</details>

Recovery

  • If update_issue fails on one item, log the failure and continue with the rest. Report failed IDs at the end.
  • If the user notices a wrong archive, the user can unarchive it themselves in Sentry. The skill never reverses its own actions automatically.
  • If the user asks "redo the plan with these tweaks" mid-flow, regenerate the plan from scratch — do not assume the previous plan still applies.

Example reasons (use this voice)

  • Third-party library noise — echarts tooltip; not actionable in our code.
  • Browser API permission noise — Clipboard writeText denied by user agent.
  • Customer-environment proxy interference — 200 response treated as error (HTML body from corporate proxy).
  • Transient backend 5xx — InternalServerError on /api/0/organizations/.../events-meta/; backend transient.
  • Test/synthetic event — smoke test or security probe, not production traffic.
  • Wrong project — Prisma/Python error mis-routed to frontend project.
  • Single-event fluke — 1 event, 1 user, no recurrence in 30+ days.
  • Browser extension noise — ReferenceError for extension-injected global (DarkReader/WeixinJSBridge).
Files3
3 files · 23.9 KB

Select a file to preview

Overall Score

88/100

Grade

A

Excellent

Safety

90

Quality

87

Clarity

88

Completeness

83

Summary

This skill automates triage of the Sentry `javascript` frontend project by identifying and archiving non-actionable issues (third-party library noise, browser API errors, synthetic events, etc.) using a documented taxonomy. It always archives with `untilEscalating` mode, never modifies other issue fields, and requires explicit user approval before applying changes via a tabular plan display.

Detected Capabilities

read Sentry issue metadata via MCPsearch issues by queryarchive issues with status=ignored and untilEscalating modedisplay structured decision tables for user approvalsequential batch processing with failure handling

Trigger Keywords

Phrases that MCP clients use to match this skill to user intent.

triage sentry javascriptarchive noisy issuesclean sentry queuebulk archive backend errorssentry frontend triage

Risk Signals

INFO

Network request to sentry.io domain

references/archive-criteria.md (caution note in category 7)
INFO

Network request to external third-party hosts

references/archive-criteria.md (category 7 scope)
INFO

MCP tool calls for issue updates

SKILL.md (workflow step 4)

Referenced Domains

External domains referenced in skill content, detected by static analysis.

sentry.sentry.iowww.apache.org

Use Cases

  • Archive third-party library noise from Sentry frontend queue
  • Triage browser API permission errors in bulk
  • Remove synthetic test events from the unresolved queue
  • Clean up customer-environment proxy and transient backend errors
  • Reduce noise in Sentry javascript project with human oversight

Quality Notes

  • Excellent scope documentation: Hard Rules section explicitly prevents mission creep (archive-only, no resolution/assignment/deletion)
  • Comprehensive taxonomy in references/archive-criteria.md with 9 categories, recognition patterns, examples, and negative criteria
  • Strong safety guardrails: requires explicit user approval before any mutations, sequential (non-parallel) update calls, failure recovery documented
  • Clear input flexibility: supports single-issue URLs, short IDs, Sentry queries, and sensible defaults
  • Structured plan format with decision matrix and user-controllable approval flow (apply, apply <subset>, cancel, edit)
  • Decision tree properly weighted (top frame > title > volume) with actionable signals and caution notes
  • Known limitations explicitly documented (no activity feed, no full stack trace, heuristic title matching)
  • Maintenance contract clearly stated with evaluation expectations and future validation requirements
Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001Analyzed: Jul 11, 2026

Reviews

Add this skill to your library to leave a review.

No reviews yet

Be the first to share your experience.

Add getsentry/triage-frontend-issues to your library

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

getsentry/triage-frontend-issues | SkillRepo