Catalog
fauziyasin-s2m4qw/studio-testing

fauziyasin-s2m4qw

studio-testing

Testing strategy for Supabase Studio. Use when writing tests, deciding what type of test to write, extracting logic from components into testable utility functions, or reviewing test coverage. Covers unit tests, component tests, and E2E test selection criteria.

v1.0LATEST
NewUpdated Jul 19, 2026

Studio Testing Strategy

How to write and structure tests for apps/studio/. The core principle: push logic out of React components into pure utility functions, then test those functions exhaustively. Only use component tests for complex UI interactions. Use E2E tests for features shared between self-hosted and platform.

When to Apply

Reference these guidelines when:

  • Writing new tests for Studio code
  • Deciding which type of test to write (unit, component, E2E)
  • Extracting logic from a component to make it testable
  • Reviewing whether test coverage is sufficient
  • Adding a new feature that needs tests

Rule Categories by Priority

Priority Category Impact Prefix
1 Logic Extraction CRITICAL testing-
2 Test Coverage CRITICAL testing-
3 Component Tests HIGH testing-
4 E2E Tests HIGH testing-

Quick Reference

1. Logic Extraction (CRITICAL)

  • testing-extract-logic - Remove logic from components into .utils.ts files as pure functions: args in, return out

2. Test Coverage (CRITICAL)

  • testing-exhaustive-permutations - Test every permutation of utility functions: happy path, malformed input, empty values, edge cases

3. Component Tests (HIGH)

  • testing-component-tests-ui-only - Only write component tests for complex UI interaction logic, not business logic

4. E2E Tests (HIGH)

  • testing-e2e-shared-features - Write E2E tests for features used in both self-hosted and platform; cover clicks AND keyboard shortcuts

Decision Tree: Which Test Type?

Is the logic a pure transformation (parse, format, validate, compute)?
  YES -> Extract to .utils.ts, write unit test with vitest
  NO  -> Does the feature involve complex UI interactions?
           YES -> Is it used in both self-hosted and platform?
                    YES -> Write E2E test in e2e/studio/features/
                    NO  -> Write component test with customRender
           NO  -> Can you extract the logic to make it pure?
                    YES -> Do that, then unit test it
                    NO  -> Write a component test

1. Extract Logic Into Utility Files (CRITICAL)

Remove as much logic from components as possible. Put it in co-located .utils.ts files as pure functions: arguments in, return value out.

File naming:

  • Utility: ComponentName.utils.ts next to the component
  • Test: tests/components/.../ComponentName.utils.test.ts mirroring the source path
// ❌ Logic buried in component — hard to test without rendering
function TaxIdForm({ taxIdValue, taxIdName }: Props) {
  const handleSubmit = () => {
    const taxId = TAX_IDS.find((t) => t.name === taxIdName)
    let sanitized = taxIdValue
    if (taxId?.vatPrefix && !taxIdValue.startsWith(taxId.vatPrefix)) {
      sanitized = taxId.vatPrefix + taxIdValue
    }
    submitToApi(sanitized)
  }
  return <form onSubmit={handleSubmit}>...</form>
}

// ✅ Logic extracted to .utils.ts — trivially testable
// TaxID.utils.ts
export function sanitizeTaxIdValue({ value, name }: { value: string; name: string }): string {
  const taxId = TAX_IDS.find((t) => t.name === name)
  if (taxId?.vatPrefix && !value.startsWith(taxId.vatPrefix)) {
    return taxId.vatPrefix + value
  }
  return value
}

// TaxIdForm.tsx — thin shell
const handleSubmit = () => {
  const sanitized = sanitizeTaxIdValue({ value: taxIdValue, name: taxIdName })
  submitToApi(sanitized)
}

2. Test Every Permutation (CRITICAL)

Once logic is extracted, test exhaustively. Every code path needs a test:

  • Valid inputs (happy path for each branch)
  • Invalid / malformed inputs
  • Empty values, null values, missing fields
  • Edge cases (timestamps with colons, special characters, boundary values)
// ❌ Only happy path
test('parses a filter', () => {
  expect(formatFilterURLParams('id:gte:20')).toStrictEqual({ column: 'id', operator: 'gte', value: '20' })
})

// ✅ Every permutation
test('parses valid filter', () => { ... })
test('handles timestamp with colons in value', () => { ... })
test('rejects malformed filter with missing parts', () => { ... })
test('rejects unrecognized operator', () => { ... })
test('allows empty filter value', () => { ... })

3. Component Tests for Complex UI Only (HIGH)

Only write component tests when there is complex UI interaction logic that cannot be captured by testing utility functions alone.

Valid reasons: conditional rendering from user interaction sequences, popover open/close with keyboard/mouse, multi-step form transitions.

Not valid: testing a calculation or transformation that happens to live in a component — extract to .utils.ts and unit test instead.

// Studio component test conventions
import { fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react'
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event'
import { customRender } from 'tests/lib/custom-render' // always use customRender, not raw render
import { addAPIMock } from 'tests/lib/msw' // API mocking in beforeEach

4. E2E Tests for Shared Features (HIGH)

If a feature exists in both self-hosted and platform, create an E2E test. Cover mouse clicks AND keyboard shortcuts (Tab, Enter, Escape, Arrow keys).

Extract reusable interactions into e2e/studio/utils/*-helpers.ts. Use try/finally for resource cleanup. For E2E execution details, see the studio-e2e-tests skill.

Codebase References

What Where
Util test examples apps/studio/tests/components/Grid/Grid.utils.test.ts, apps/studio/tests/components/Billing/TaxID.utils.test.ts, apps/studio/tests/components/Editor/SpreadsheetImport.utils.test.ts
Component test examples apps/studio/tests/features/logs/LogsFilterPopover.test.tsx, apps/studio/tests/components/CopyButton.test.tsx
E2E test example e2e/studio/features/filter-bar.spec.ts
E2E helpers pattern e2e/studio/utils/filter-bar-helpers.ts
Custom render apps/studio/tests/lib/custom-render.tsx
MSW mock setup apps/studio/tests/lib/msw.ts (addAPIMock)
Test README apps/studio/tests/README.md
Vitest config apps/studio/vitest.config.ts
Related skills studio-e2e-tests (running E2E), vitest (API reference), vercel-composition-patterns (component architecture)

Overall Score

88/100

Grade

A

Excellent

Grades are signals, not a certification. Always review a skill yourself before use.

Safety

95

Quality

87

Clarity

88

Completeness

82

Summary

This skill provides comprehensive testing guidance for Supabase Studio, emphasizing the extraction of logic from React components into pure utility functions that can be tested exhaustively with unit tests. It classifies tests into unit/utility tests (highest priority), component tests (complex UI only), and E2E tests (shared features), with a clear decision tree to help developers choose the appropriate testing strategy and file organization conventions.

Detected Capabilities

code structure guidancetesting framework recommendation (vitest)file organization and naming conventionstest coverage strategy

Trigger Keywords

Phrases that agents use to match this skill to user intent.

write teststest coverageextract logicunit test utilitycomponent test uie2e test sharedtest decision treevitest setup

Use Cases

  • Extract and validate business logic from React components into testable utility functions
  • Decide whether to write unit, component, or E2E tests for a new feature
  • Write exhaustive unit tests covering happy paths, edge cases, and error conditions
  • Ensure component tests focus on UI interaction logic rather than business logic
  • Create E2E tests for features shared between self-hosted and platform deployments with keyboard and mouse interaction coverage

Quality Notes

  • Clear decision tree with visual formatting helps developers make testing choices without ambiguity
  • Concrete before/after code examples demonstrate the logic extraction principle effectively
  • Exhaustive test coverage criteria (happy path, malformed input, empty values, edge cases) are well-defined and actionable
  • File path organization is clearly specified with mirror structure for test co-location
  • References to specific codebase locations and existing examples enable developers to find real patterns to follow
  • Comprehensive codebase reference table reduces friction for finding utilities, custom render, and MSW setup
  • Well-organized priority-based rule categories with specific rule names (e.g., 'testing-extract-logic') create memorable guidelines
Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001Analyzed: Jul 19, 2026

Reviews

Add this skill to your library to leave a review.

No reviews yet

Be the first to share your experience.

Use fauziyasin-s2m4qw/studio-testing in your dev environment

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...