Catalog
affaan-m/ito-inference

affaan-m

ito-inference

Inspect the availability of model serving on a completed Itô compute booking and, when the canonical backend becomes available, hand off an explicitly confirmed serving manifest. Use after ito-compute has booked GPU nodes and the user asks for an OpenAI-compatible endpoint, ito-serve, hosted Kimi, or self-hosted open-weights inference. ECC implements no serving stack of its own.

NewUpdated Sep 9, 2026

Itô Inference

ito-inference is the sole canonical ECC skill for inference serving on Itô compute. Requests naming ito-serve route here; do not create or install a second ito-serve skill. ECC never SSHes to nodes, downloads weights, launches an engine, or exposes an endpoint; it never books, reserves, or spends.

Current production boundary

Managed serving is unavailable today. The ECC bridge exposes only login, auth, find, status, and explicitly gated evals. It has no serve verb. The canonical runtime documents inference only as an unsupported compatibility probe; ECC does not invoke or depend on it. The MCP surface exposes only auth, find, and status. The locally enforceable guarantee is that ECC rejects serve before resolving or spawning the credential-bearing canonical client.

Therefore stop before authentication or any command invocation. Report the missing capability and return to the originating agent. Never substitute a local runner, SSH helper, browser workflow, purchase endpoint, or any untracked local ito-serve draft.

Required entitlement

When serving is implemented, its first gate is a server-verified completed booking. Harness memory, an RFQ, a quote, node IPs, or SSH access are not proof of entitlement. The backend must return fresh serving eligibility bound to the authenticated account, booking, GPU topology, region, fabric, term, and model policy. Expired, revoked, mismatched, incomplete, or already-released bookings fail closed before confirmation.

Future CLI and API contract

The intended command name is serve; inference may remain only as an explicitly deprecated compatibility alias after the production contract lands. The future handoff must be equivalent to:

ecc ito serve \
  --booking <server-verified-booking-id> \
  --manifest <absolute-reviewed-json-file> \
  --confirmation-ref <opaque-non-authorizing-reference> \
  --idempotency-key <stable-retry-key> \
  --json

The reviewed manifest must identify the model revision, engine and version, quantization, tensor/pipeline topology, endpoint exposure policy, artifact checksums, storage ceiling, runtime limits, optional TTFT/TPOT objectives, and maximum incremental cost. No raw API key, SSH key, node password, or bearer token belongs in arguments, manifests, logs, MCP results, or chat.

The client must canonicalize the manifest path, reject symlinks, open a regular file without following links, require appropriate ownership and restrictive permissions, enforce a bounded size, and hash bytes from the opened descriptor. That digest must exactly equal the digest bound into confirmation before any workload mutation. A path swap, digest mismatch, oversized file, or mutable unsafe file fails closed.

The canonical API—not ECC—must own workload creation and return structured JSON with ok, live_api_contacted, notice, and either data or error. Serving data must include stable booking, workload, manifest, and idempotency IDs plus a state enum; it must not claim an endpoint is live until health and model checks pass. Errors must include a stable code and safe message without secrets.

Confirmation and execution gates

Before workload creation, require all of the following:

  1. Fresh entitlement and serving eligibility from the canonical backend.
  2. A reviewable immutable manifest and deterministic digest.
  3. A separate single-use confirmation bound to account, action, manifest, and cost, with a short expiry and replay protection. CLI arguments carry only an opaque, non-authorizing confirmation reference; the server resolves and consumes the bearer capability out of band.
  4. A caller-supplied idempotency key reserved atomically with the workload.
  5. Server-side fabric, capacity, model-policy, storage, and cost validation.

Authentication is identity, not workload authority. A login, API key, quote, or completed booking never substitutes for the serving confirmation. Inspection and plan generation must not create a workload. Cancel and cleanup are separate mutations with their own scoped confirmation and idempotency boundaries.

Lifecycle and recovery

The production surface is incomplete until the same canonical client exposes tenant-scoped status, logs, metrics, cancel, and cleanup operations. Every operation needs bounded connect and overall timeouts, revocation-aware errors, and structured output. After an ambiguous transport failure, query status by the idempotency key before retrying; never create a second workload merely because the first response was lost. A revoked credential stops polling and returns control to the originating agent without starting login automatically.

Only report ready after endpoint health, model identity, and canary inference all pass. Report intermediate and terminal failure states honestly. Cleanup must be observable and must not release or modify the underlying booking unless that separate economic action was explicitly authorized.

Proposed backend stages

These stages describe the future backend, not code that exists in ECC:

  1. Verify entitlement, topology, fabric, and cost gates.
  2. Fetch checksum-pinned weights into backend-managed storage.
  3. Emit and validate a reviewable topology/engine plan.
  4. Launch through the provider control plane, never direct root SSH from ECC.
  5. Warm up, test health and model identity, run an SLO canary, then register the endpoint and redacted configuration.

Until every gate and lifecycle operation above exists in the canonical runtime, this skill remains a fail-closed availability check and documentation handoff.

Files1
1 files · 1.0 KB

Select a file to preview

Overall Score

82/100

Grade

B

Good

Grades are signals, not a certification. Always review a skill yourself before use.

Safety

88

Quality

85

Clarity

82

Completeness

72

Summary

ito-inference is a documentation and availability-check skill for ECC (a managed compute platform) that describes the intended design of inference serving on Itô compute. The skill explicitly documents current limitations — serving is not yet implemented — and establishes security boundaries for the future production system, including manifest validation, confirmation gates, and credential handling policies.

Detected Capabilities

documentationavailability checkmanifest inspectioncredential validation (planned)state reporting

Trigger Keywords

Phrases that agents use to match this skill to user intent.

inference serving endpointito-serve availabilitymodel serving manifestgpu booking endpointinference eligibility check

Risk Signals

INFO

Skill explicitly blocks serving-related operations until backend is ready

Current production boundary section
INFO

No serving capability implemented; all serve requests must be rejected before auth or command invocation

Current production boundary section
INFO

Credentials never appear in arguments, manifests, logs, or MCP results — scoped by design

Future CLI and API contract section
INFO

Manifest path must be validated (no symlinks, restrictive permissions, size-bounded, hash-verified)

Future CLI and API contract section

Use Cases

  • Check whether inference serving is available on a completed Itô booking
  • Understand the entitlement and verification requirements for serving workloads
  • Review the planned manifest and confirmation flow for inference endpoints
  • Learn the security and audit boundaries for serving operations
  • Prepare for future Itô serve CLI contract and API evolution

Quality Notes

  • Skill is well-structured with clear section hierarchy (Current production boundary, Required entitlement, Future CLI, Confirmation gates, Lifecycle, Proposed backend stages)
  • Security-first approach: explicitly documents what NOT to do (no SSH, no local runners, no credentials in output) before describing future behavior
  • Comprehensive entitlement and confirmation gates clearly specified; reduces risk of unauthorized serving
  • Manifest validation requirements are thorough (ownership, permissions, size, hash verification, symlink rejection)
  • Skill correctly positions itself as documentation + availability check, not implementation — manages expectations
  • Good use of concrete examples (CLI contract with flags) and structured output format (ok, live_api_contacted, notice, data/error)
  • Lifecycle and recovery section covers ambiguous failures (status queries by idempotency key) and revocation handling
Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001Analyzed: Sep 9, 2026

Reviews

Add this skill to your library to leave a review.

No reviews yet

Be the first to share your experience.

Version History

  1. v2.0

    Contract changed: description

    ✦ AIExpands scope from executing a single backend serving path to inspecting availability and confirming endpoint options: OpenAI-compatible, ito-serve, Kimi, or self-hosted open-weights.

    triggering2026-09-09

    LATEST
  2. v1.0

    2026-08-07

    View This VersionInitial version

Use affaan-m/ito-inference in your dev environment

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...