Catalog
affaan-m/healthcare-phi-compliance

affaan-m

healthcare-phi-compliance

Protected Health Information (PHI) and Personally Identifiable Information (PII) compliance patterns for healthcare applications. Covers data classification, access control, audit trails, encryption, and common leak vectors.

global
origin:Health1 Super Speciality Hospitals — contributed by Dr. Keyur Patel
New~1.4k
v1.2Saved Jul 14, 2026

Healthcare PHI/PII Compliance Patterns

Patterns for protecting patient data, clinician data, and financial data in healthcare applications. Applicable to HIPAA (US), DISHA (India), GDPR (EU), and general healthcare data protection.

When to Use

  • Building any feature that touches patient records
  • Implementing access control or authentication for clinical systems
  • Designing database schemas for healthcare data
  • Building APIs that return patient or clinician data
  • Implementing audit trails or logging
  • Reviewing code for data exposure vulnerabilities
  • Setting up Row-Level Security (RLS) for multi-tenant healthcare systems

How It Works

Healthcare data protection operates on three layers: classification (what is sensitive), access control (who can see it), and audit (who did see it).

Data Classification

PHI (Protected Health Information) — any data that can identify a patient AND relates to their health: patient name, date of birth, address, phone, email, national ID numbers (SSN, Aadhaar, NHS number), medical record numbers, diagnoses, medications, lab results, imaging, insurance policy and claim details, appointment and admission records, or any combination of the above.

PII (Non-patient-sensitive data) in healthcare systems: clinician/staff personal details, doctor fee structures and payout amounts, employee salary and bank details, vendor payment information.

Access Control: Row-Level Security

ALTER TABLE patients ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;

-- Scope access by facility
CREATE POLICY "staff_read_own_facility"
  ON patients FOR SELECT TO authenticated
  USING (facility_id IN (
    SELECT facility_id FROM staff_assignments
    WHERE user_id = auth.uid() AND role IN ('doctor','nurse','lab_tech','admin')
  ));

-- Audit log: insert-only (tamper-proof)
CREATE POLICY "audit_insert_only" ON audit_log FOR INSERT
  TO authenticated WITH CHECK (user_id = auth.uid());
CREATE POLICY "audit_no_modify" ON audit_log FOR UPDATE USING (false);
CREATE POLICY "audit_no_delete" ON audit_log FOR DELETE USING (false);

Audit Trail

Every PHI access or modification must be logged:

interface AuditEntry {
  timestamp: string;
  user_id: string;
  patient_id: string;
  action: 'create' | 'read' | 'update' | 'delete' | 'print' | 'export';
  resource_type: string;
  resource_id: string;
  changes?: { before: object; after: object };
  ip_address: string;
  session_id: string;
}

Common Leak Vectors

Error messages: Never include patient-identifying data in error messages thrown to the client. Log details server-side only.

Console output: Never log full patient objects. Use opaque internal record IDs (UUIDs) — not medical record numbers, national IDs, or names.

URL parameters: Never put patient-identifying data in query strings or path segments that could appear in logs or browser history. Use opaque UUIDs only.

Browser storage: Never store PHI in localStorage or sessionStorage. Keep PHI in memory only, fetch on demand.

Service role keys: Never use the service_role key in client-side code. Always use the anon/publishable key and let RLS enforce access.

Logs and monitoring: Never log full patient records. Use opaque record IDs only (not medical record numbers). Sanitize stack traces before sending to error tracking services.

Database Schema Tagging

Mark PHI/PII columns at the schema level:

COMMENT ON COLUMN patients.name IS 'PHI: patient_name';
COMMENT ON COLUMN patients.dob IS 'PHI: date_of_birth';
COMMENT ON COLUMN patients.aadhaar IS 'PHI: national_id';
COMMENT ON COLUMN doctor_payouts.amount IS 'PII: financial';

Deployment Checklist

Before every deployment:

  • No PHI in error messages or stack traces
  • No PHI in console.log/console.error
  • No PHI in URL parameters
  • No PHI in browser storage
  • No service_role key in client code
  • RLS enabled on all PHI/PII tables
  • Audit trail for all data modifications
  • Session timeout configured
  • API authentication on all PHI endpoints
  • Cross-facility data isolation verified

Examples

Example 1: Safe vs Unsafe Error Handling

// BAD — leaks PHI in error
throw new Error(`Patient ${patient.name} not found in ${patient.facility}`);

// GOOD — generic error, details logged server-side with opaque IDs only
logger.error('Patient lookup failed', { recordId: patient.id, facilityId });
throw new Error('Record not found');

Example 2: RLS Policy for Multi-Facility Isolation

-- Doctor at Facility A cannot see Facility B patients
CREATE POLICY "facility_isolation"
  ON patients FOR SELECT TO authenticated
  USING (facility_id IN (
    SELECT facility_id FROM staff_assignments WHERE user_id = auth.uid()
  ));

-- Test: login as doctor-facility-a, query facility-b patients
-- Expected: 0 rows returned

Example 3: Safe Logging

// BAD — logs identifiable patient data
console.log('Processing patient:', patient);

// GOOD — logs only opaque internal record ID
console.log('Processing record:', patient.id);
// Note: even patient.id should be an opaque UUID, not a medical record number
Files1
1 files · 1.0 KB

Select a file to preview

Overall Score

88/100

Grade

A

Excellent

Safety

92

Quality

87

Clarity

89

Completeness

82

Summary

This skill provides structured patterns and guidance for protecting healthcare PHI and PII data in applications, covering data classification, access control via Row-Level Security, audit trail implementation, common data leak vectors, and pre-deployment verification checklists. It offers SQL policies, TypeScript interfaces, and concrete safe vs. unsafe code examples aligned with HIPAA, GDPR, and DISHA compliance frameworks.

Detected Capabilities

code analysisschema documentationaccess control pattern guidanceerror handling reviewaudit trail designdata classification guidance

Trigger Keywords

Phrases that MCP clients use to match this skill to user intent.

hipaa compliancepatient data access controlhealthcare rls policyphi audit trailsmulti-tenant isolationsensitive data classificationpii exposure review

Risk Signals

INFO

No destructive, credential harvesting, or exfiltration patterns detected. Skill provides defensive guidance only (access control, audit, data protection patterns).

Overall skill content

Use Cases

  • Building HIPAA-compliant patient data systems
  • Implementing row-level security for multi-tenant healthcare applications
  • Designing audit trails for PHI access and modifications
  • Reviewing healthcare code for data exposure vulnerabilities
  • Setting up facility-level data isolation in clinical systems
  • Configuring database schema annotations for sensitive data
  • Ensuring error handling and logging do not leak patient identifiers

Quality Notes

  • Excellent alignment with healthcare compliance standards (HIPAA, GDPR, DISHA). Clear data classification definitions (PHI vs. PII) that set context for all downstream guidance.
  • Concrete SQL and TypeScript examples show implementation patterns directly applicable to real systems. Safe vs. unsafe side-by-side comparisons make violations obvious.
  • Comprehensive common-leak-vectors section identifies real-world exposure points (error messages, console logs, URL parameters, browser storage, service keys, logs). This is highly practical.
  • Pre-deployment checklist provides actionable verification steps that can be directly integrated into CI/CD or code review processes.
  • Well-structured with clear section hierarchy and appropriate use of code blocks, comments, and formatting for readability.
  • Minor: scope could explicitly note that this skill guides pattern *selection* and *review* — it does not generate production code or automatically enforce these patterns. Does not guide implementation of specific frameworks (e.g., Supabase, Firebase, custom backends).
Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001Analyzed: Jul 14, 2026

Reviews

Add this skill to your library to leave a review.

No reviews yet

Be the first to share your experience.

Version History

v1.2

Content updated

2026-07-14

Latest
v1.1

Content updated

2026-04-20

v1.0

No changelog

2026-04-12

Use affaan-m/healthcare-phi-compliance in your dev environment

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...