Catalog
softaworks/gepetto

softaworks

gepetto

Creates detailed, sectionized implementation plans through research, stakeholder interviews, and multi-LLM review. Use when planning features that need thorough pre-implementation analysis.

global
0installs0uses~2.7k
v1.1Saved Apr 20, 2026

Gepetto

Orchestrates a multi-step planning process: Research → Interview → Spec Synthesis → Plan → External Review → Sections

CRITICAL: First Actions

BEFORE anything else, do these in order:

1. Print Intro

Print intro banner immediately:

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
GEPETTO: AI-Assisted Implementation Planning
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Research → Interview → Spec Synthesis → Plan → External Review → Sections

Note: GEPETTO will write many .md files to the planning directory you pass it

2. Validate Spec File Input

Check if user provided @file at invocation AND it's a spec file (ends with .md).

If NO @file was provided OR the path doesn't end with .md, output this and STOP:

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
GEPETTO: Spec File Required
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

This skill requires a markdown spec file path (must end with .md).
The planning directory is inferred from the spec file's parent directory.

To start a NEW plan:
  1. Create a markdown spec file describing what you want to build
  2. It can be as detailed or as vague as you like
  3. Place it in a directory where gepetto can save planning files
  4. Run: /gepetto @path/to/your-spec.md

To RESUME an existing plan:
  1. Run: /gepetto @path/to/your-spec.md

Example: /gepetto @planning/my-feature-spec.md
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Do not continue. Wait for user to re-invoke with a .md file path.

3. Setup Planning Session

Determine session state by checking existing files:

  1. Set planning_dir = parent directory of the spec file

  2. Set initial_file = the spec file path

  3. Scan for existing planning files:

    • claude-research.md
    • claude-interview.md
    • claude-spec.md
    • claude-plan.md
    • claude-integration-notes.md
    • claude-ralph-loop-prompt.md
    • claude-ralphy-prd.md
    • reviews/ directory
    • sections/ directory
  4. Determine mode and resume point:

Files Found Mode Resume From
None new Step 4
research only resume Step 6 (interview)
research + interview resume Step 8 (spec synthesis)
+ spec resume Step 9 (plan)
+ plan resume Step 10 (external review)
+ reviews resume Step 11 (integrate)
+ integration-notes resume Step 12 (user review)
+ sections/index.md resume Step 14 (write sections)
all sections complete resume Step 15 (execution files)
+ claude-ralph-loop-prompt.md + claude-ralphy-prd.md complete Done
  1. Create TODO list with TodoWrite based on current state

Print status:

Planning directory: {planning_dir}
Mode: {mode}

If resuming:

Resuming from step {N}
To start fresh, delete the planning directory files.

Logging Format

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
STEP {N}/17: {STEP_NAME}
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
{details}
Step {N} complete: {summary}
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

Workflow

4. Research Decision

See research-protocol.md.

  1. Read the spec file
  2. Extract potential research topics (technologies, patterns, integrations)
  3. Ask user about codebase research needs
  4. Ask user about web research needs (present derived topics as multi-select)
  5. Record which research types to perform in step 5

5. Execute Research

See research-protocol.md.

Based on decisions from step 4, launch research subagents:

  • Codebase research: Task(subagent_type=Explore)
  • Web research: Task(subagent_type=Explore) with WebSearch

If both are needed, launch both Task tools in parallel (single message with multiple tool calls).

Important: Subagents return their findings - they do NOT write files directly. After collecting results from all subagents, combine them and write to <planning_dir>/claude-research.md.

Skip this step entirely if user chose no research in step 4.

6. Detailed Interview

See interview-protocol.md

Run in main context (AskUserQuestion requires it). The interview should be informed by:

  • The initial spec
  • Research findings (if any)

7. Save Interview Transcript

Write Q&A to <planning_dir>/claude-interview.md

8. Write Initial Spec (Spec Synthesis)

Combine into <planning_dir>/claude-spec.md:

  • Initial input (the spec file)
  • Research findings (if step 5 was done)
  • Interview answers (from step 6)

This synthesizes the user's raw requirements into a complete specification.

9. Generate Implementation Plan

Create detailed plan → <planning_dir>/claude-plan.md

IMPORTANT: Write for an unfamiliar reader. The plan must be fully self-contained - an engineer or LLM with no prior context should understand what we're building, why, and how just from reading this document.

10. External Review

See external-review.md

Launch TWO subagents in parallel to review the plan:

  1. Gemini via Bash
  2. Codex via Bash

Both receive the plan content and return their analysis. Write results to <planning_dir>/reviews/.

11. Integrate External Feedback

Analyze the suggestions in <planning_dir>/reviews/.

You are the authority on what to integrate or not. It's OK if you decide to not integrate anything.

Step 1: Write <planning_dir>/claude-integration-notes.md documenting:

  • What suggestions you're integrating and why
  • What suggestions you're NOT integrating and why

Step 2: Update <planning_dir>/claude-plan.md with the integrated changes.

12. User Review of Integrated Plan

Use AskUserQuestion:

The plan has been updated with external feedback. You can now review and edit claude-plan.md.

If you want Claude's help editing the plan, open a separate Claude session - this session
is mid-workflow and can't assist with edits until the workflow completes.

When you're done reviewing, select "Done" to continue.

Options: "Done reviewing"

Wait for user confirmation before proceeding.

13. Create Section Index

See section-index.md

Read claude-plan.md. Identify natural section boundaries and create <planning_dir>/sections/index.md.

CRITICAL: index.md MUST start with a SECTION_MANIFEST block. See the reference for format requirements.

Write index.md before proceeding to section file creation.

14. Write Section Files — Parallel Subagents

See section-splitting.md

Launch parallel subagents - one Task per section for maximum efficiency:

  1. First, parse sections/index.md to get the SECTION_MANIFEST list
  2. Then launch ALL section Tasks in a single message (parallel execution):
# Launch all in ONE message for parallel execution:

Task(
  subagent_type="general-purpose",
  prompt="""
  Write section file: section-01-{name}

  Inputs:
  - <planning_dir>/claude-plan.md
  - <planning_dir>/sections/index.md

  Output: <planning_dir>/sections/section-01-{name}.md

  The section file must be COMPLETELY SELF-CONTAINED. Include:
  - Background (why this section exists)
  - Requirements (what must be true when complete)
  - Dependencies (requires/blocks)
  - Implementation details (from the plan)
  - Acceptance criteria (checkboxes)
  - Files to create/modify

  The implementer should NOT need to reference any other document.
  """
)

Task(
  subagent_type="general-purpose",
  prompt="Write section file: section-02-{name} ..."
)

Task(
  subagent_type="general-purpose",
  prompt="Write section file: section-03-{name} ..."
)

# ... one Task per section in the manifest

Wait for ALL subagents to complete before proceeding.

15. Generate Execution Files — Subagent

Delegate to subagent to reduce main context token usage:

Task(
  subagent_type="general-purpose",
  prompt="""
  Generate two execution files for autonomous implementation.

  Input files:
  - <planning_dir>/sections/index.md (has SECTION_MANIFEST)
  - <planning_dir>/sections/section-*.md (all section files)

  OUTPUT 1: <planning_dir>/claude-ralph-loop-prompt.md
  For ralph-loop plugin. EMBED all section content inline.

  Structure:
  - Mission statement
  - Full content of sections/index.md
  - Full content of EACH section file (embedded, not referenced)
  - Execution rules (dependency order, verify acceptance criteria)
  - Completion signal: <promise>ALL-SECTIONS-COMPLETE</promise>

  OUTPUT 2: <planning_dir>/claude-ralphy-prd.md
  For Ralphy CLI. REFERENCE section files (don't embed).

  Structure:
  - PRD header
  - How to use (ralphy --prd command)
  - Context explanation
  - Checkbox task list: one "- [ ] Section NN: {name}" per section

  Write both files.
  """
)

Wait for subagent completion before proceeding.

16. Final Status

Verify all files were created successfully:

  • All section files from SECTION_MANIFEST
  • claude-ralph-loop-prompt.md
  • claude-ralphy-prd.md

17. Output Summary

Print generated files and next steps:

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
GEPETTO: Planning Complete
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Generated files:
  - claude-research.md (research findings)
  - claude-interview.md (Q&A transcript)
  - claude-spec.md (synthesized specification)
  - claude-plan.md (implementation plan)
  - claude-integration-notes.md (feedback decisions)
  - reviews/ (external LLM feedback)
  - sections/ (implementation units)
  - claude-ralph-loop-prompt.md (for ralph-loop plugin)
  - claude-ralphy-prd.md (for Ralphy CLI)

How to implement:

Option A - Manual (recommended for learning/control):
  1. Read sections/index.md to understand dependencies
  2. Implement each section file in order
  3. Each section is self-contained with acceptance criteria

Option B - Autonomous with ralph-loop (Claude Code plugin):
  /ralph-loop @<planning_dir>/claude-ralph-loop-prompt.md --completion-promise "COMPLETE" --max-iterations 100

Option C - Autonomous with Ralphy (external CLI):
  ralphy --prd <planning_dir>/claude-ralphy-prd.md
  # Or: cp <planning_dir>/claude-ralphy-prd.md ./PRD.md && ralphy
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Files7
7 files · 37.5 KB

Select a file to preview

Overall Score

82/100

Grade

B

Good

Safety

85

Quality

84

Clarity

82

Completeness

77

Summary

Gepetto is a structured planning skill that transforms vague feature ideas into detailed, sectionized implementation plans through a multi-step workflow: research, stakeholder interviews, specification synthesis, implementation planning, external LLM review, and section-based task decomposition. It guides users through decision points, delegates research and section writing to parallel subagents, and generates output files compatible with autonomous execution tools (ralph-loop, Ralphy).

Detected Capabilities

Multi-step workflow orchestration with resumption supportFile-based session state detection and persistenceParallel subagent coordination (research, section writing)External CLI integration (Gemini, Codex for reviews)Markdown generation for multiple output formatsConditional step execution based on user decisionsDependency graph management for section ordering

Trigger Keywords

Phrases that MCP clients use to match this skill to user intent.

plan feature implementationresearch before codingbreak down large projectexternal architecture reviewspecification synthesisresume planning session

Risk Signals

INFO

External CLI commands (Gemini, Codex) referenced but not executed by skill itself

references/external-review.md, lines showing gemini/codex bash commands
INFO

File write operations to user-specified planning directory

SKILL.md step 3, steps 5-15 (claude-*.md, sections/*.md files)
INFO

Subagent delegation pattern where child tasks write files directly

Step 14 (section writing) and Step 15 (execution files)
WARNING

Assumption of external CLI availability without fallback for Gemini/Codex

references/external-review.md: 'If neither CLI is available, skip'

Referenced Domains

External domains referenced in skill content, detected by static analysis.

github.com

Use Cases

  • Planning complex features before implementation
  • Refining vague requirements into detailed specifications
  • Getting external architectural review via Gemini/Codex CLIs
  • Breaking large projects into parallel-executable sections
  • Resuming interrupted planning workflows

Quality Notes

  • Excellent documentation: comprehensive README with clear workflow diagrams, installation instructions, and integration guides for ralph-loop and Ralphy
  • Well-structured reference files: research-protocol, interview-protocol, external-review, section-index, and section-splitting are modular and actionable
  • Strong resumption logic: clear state detection via file presence checks and mapping to resume points (table in SKILL.md step 3 is particularly clear)
  • Clear section file requirements: section-splitting.md mandates self-contained sections with explicit template, reducing ambiguity for implementers
  • Good error handling guidance for research phase (retries, fallbacks for failed subagents documented in research-protocol.md)
  • SECTION_MANIFEST block is a clever parsing pattern for robustly detecting section lists without fragile line counting
  • Logging format with consistent delimiters (═══) aids readability and progress tracking during long workflows
  • Multiple execution paths documented: manual implementation, ralph-loop plugin, Ralphy CLI with clear pros/cons for each
  • Minor weakness: interview-protocol.md lacks concrete examples of follow-up questioning technique or when to stop interviewing
  • Minor weakness: no guidance on handling very large plans that exceed token limits mid-workflow
Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001Analyzed: Apr 20, 2026

Reviews

Add this skill to your library to leave a review.

No reviews yet

Be the first to share your experience.

Version History

v1.1

Content updated

2026-04-20

Latest
v1.0

No changelog

2026-04-12

Add softaworks/gepetto to your library

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...