Catalog
obra/using-git-worktrees

obra

using-git-worktrees

Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - ensures an isolated workspace exists via native tools or git worktree fallback

global
New~1.9k
v2.0Saved Jun 28, 2026

Using Git Worktrees

Overview

Ensure work happens in an isolated workspace. Prefer your platform's native worktree tools. Fall back to manual git worktrees only when no native tool is available.

Core principle: Detect existing isolation first. Then use native tools. Then fall back to git. Never fight the harness.

Announce at start: "I'm using the using-git-worktrees skill to set up an isolated workspace."

Step 0: Detect Existing Isolation

Before creating anything, check if you are already in an isolated workspace.

GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current)

Submodule guard: GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON is also true inside git submodules. Before concluding "already in a worktree," verify you are not in a submodule:

# If this returns a path, you're in a submodule, not a worktree — treat as normal repo
git rev-parse --show-superproject-working-tree 2>/dev/null

If GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON (and not a submodule): You are already in a linked worktree. Skip to Step 2 (Project Setup). Do NOT create another worktree.

Report with branch state:

  • On a branch: "Already in isolated workspace at <path> on branch <name>."
  • Detached HEAD: "Already in isolated workspace at <path> (detached HEAD, externally managed). Branch creation needed at finish time."

If GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON (or in a submodule): You are in a normal repo checkout.

Has the user already indicated their worktree preference in your instructions? If not, ask for consent before creating a worktree:

"Would you like me to set up an isolated worktree? It protects your current branch from changes."

Honor any existing declared preference without asking. If the user declines consent, work in place and skip to Step 2.

Step 1: Create Isolated Workspace

You have two mechanisms. Try them in this order.

1a. Native Worktree Tools (preferred)

The user has asked for an isolated workspace (Step 0 consent). Do you already have a way to create a worktree? It might be a tool with a name like EnterWorktree, WorktreeCreate, a /worktree command, or a --worktree flag. If you do, use it and skip to Step 2.

Native tools handle directory placement, branch creation, and cleanup automatically. Using git worktree add when you have a native tool creates phantom state your harness can't see or manage.

Only proceed to Step 1b if you have no native worktree tool available.

1b. Git Worktree Fallback

Only use this if Step 1a does not apply — you have no native worktree tool available. Create a worktree manually using git.

Directory Selection

Follow this priority order. Explicit user preference always beats observed filesystem state.

  1. Check your instructions for a declared worktree directory preference. If the user has already specified one, use it without asking.

  2. Check for an existing project-local worktree directory:

    ls -d .worktrees 2>/dev/null     # Preferred (hidden)
    ls -d worktrees 2>/dev/null      # Alternative
    

    If found, use it. If both exist, .worktrees wins.

  3. If there is no other guidance available, default to .worktrees/ at the project root.

Safety Verification (project-local directories only)

MUST verify directory is ignored before creating worktree:

git check-ignore -q .worktrees 2>/dev/null || git check-ignore -q worktrees 2>/dev/null

If NOT ignored: Add to .gitignore, commit the change, then proceed.

Why critical: Prevents accidentally committing worktree contents to repository.

Create the Worktree

# Determine path based on chosen location
path="$LOCATION/$BRANCH_NAME"

git worktree add "$path" -b "$BRANCH_NAME"
cd "$path"

Sandbox fallback: If git worktree add fails with a permission error (sandbox denial), tell the user the sandbox blocked worktree creation and you're working in the current directory instead. Then run setup and baseline tests in place.

Step 2: Project Setup

Auto-detect and run appropriate setup:

# Node.js
if [ -f package.json ]; then npm install; fi

# Rust
if [ -f Cargo.toml ]; then cargo build; fi

# Python
if [ -f requirements.txt ]; then pip install -r requirements.txt; fi
if [ -f pyproject.toml ]; then poetry install; fi

# Go
if [ -f go.mod ]; then go mod download; fi

Step 3: Verify Clean Baseline

Run tests to ensure workspace starts clean:

# Use project-appropriate command
npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...

If tests fail: Report failures, ask whether to proceed or investigate.

If tests pass: Report ready.

Report

Worktree ready at <full-path>
Tests passing (<N> tests, 0 failures)
Ready to implement <feature-name>

Quick Reference

Situation Action
Already in linked worktree Skip creation (Step 0)
In a submodule Treat as normal repo (Step 0 guard)
Native worktree tool available Use it (Step 1a)
No native tool Git worktree fallback (Step 1b)
.worktrees/ exists Use it (verify ignored)
worktrees/ exists Use it (verify ignored)
Both exist Use .worktrees/
Neither exists Check instruction file, then default .worktrees/
Directory not ignored Add to .gitignore + commit
Permission error on create Sandbox fallback, work in place
Tests fail during baseline Report failures + ask
No package.json/Cargo.toml Skip dependency install

Common Mistakes

Fighting the harness

  • Problem: Using git worktree add when the platform already provides isolation
  • Fix: Step 0 detects existing isolation. Step 1a defers to native tools.

Skipping detection

  • Problem: Creating a nested worktree inside an existing one
  • Fix: Always run Step 0 before creating anything

Skipping ignore verification

  • Problem: Worktree contents get tracked, pollute git status
  • Fix: Always use git check-ignore before creating project-local worktree

Assuming directory location

  • Problem: Creates inconsistency, violates project conventions
  • Fix: Follow priority: explicit instructions > existing project-local directory > default

Proceeding with failing tests

  • Problem: Can't distinguish new bugs from pre-existing issues
  • Fix: Report failures, get explicit permission to proceed

Red Flags

Never:

  • Create a worktree when Step 0 detects existing isolation
  • Use git worktree add when you have a native worktree tool (e.g., EnterWorktree). This is the #1 mistake — if you have it, use it.
  • Skip Step 1a by jumping straight to Step 1b's git commands
  • Create worktree without verifying it's ignored (project-local)
  • Skip baseline test verification
  • Proceed with failing tests without asking

Always:

  • Run Step 0 detection first
  • Prefer native tools over git fallback
  • Follow directory priority: explicit instructions > existing project-local directory > default
  • Verify directory is ignored for project-local
  • Auto-detect and run project setup
  • Verify clean test baseline
Files1
1 files · 1.0 KB

Select a file to preview

Overall Score

87/100

Grade

A

Excellent

Safety

88

Quality

86

Clarity

89

Completeness

84

Summary

This skill guides agents to set up isolated workspaces for feature development, preferring native platform tools and falling back to git worktrees when necessary. It includes detection logic to avoid creating nested worktrees, safety checks to prevent tracking worktree contents in git, and project setup/baseline verification steps.

Detected Capabilities

file read (.gitignore detection)shell command execution (git commands)directory creation (worktree setup)automatic project dependency detection (npm, cargo, poetry, etc.)test execution (npm test, cargo test, pytest, go test)

Trigger Keywords

Phrases that MCP clients use to match this skill to user intent.

isolated feature workspacegit worktree setupparallel branch developmentsandbox workspace creationfeature branch isolation

Use Cases

  • Starting isolated feature development without affecting the main branch
  • Creating a safe experimental workspace for trying implementation approaches
  • Ensuring baseline tests pass before beginning work
  • Managing multiple parallel feature branches with separate working directories
  • Complying with platform-native workspace isolation when available

Quality Notes

  • Excellent structure: Step 0–3 flow is logical and documented with clear decision trees
  • Comprehensive safety guardrails: explicitly prevents nested worktrees, verifies .gitignore before creating directories, checks for submodule context
  • Strong error handling: sandbox permission errors handled gracefully with fallback to in-place work, test failures trigger user confirmation
  • Red Flags section explicitly lists common mistakes and their fixes, reinforcing correct behavior
  • Quick Reference table provides a useful lookup guide for decision logic
  • Clear consent model: asks user permission before creating worktree (Step 0) unless preference already declared
  • Project-agnostic: auto-detects language/framework (Node, Rust, Python, Go) and runs appropriate setup
  • Minor: 'Announce at start' instruction is present but could be more prominent in workflow
Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001Analyzed: Jun 28, 2026

Reviews

Add this skill to your library to leave a review.

No reviews yet

Be the first to share your experience.

Version History

  1. v2.0

    Contract changed: description

    ✦ AIRestructures workflow to detect existing isolation first, prefers native worktree tools over manual git, adds submodule guard, and provides sandbox fallback behavior.

    triggering2026-06-28

    Latest
  2. v1.0

    2026-05-02

    Initial version

Use obra/using-git-worktrees in your dev environment

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...