Catalog
affaan-m/deep-research

affaan-m

deep-research

Multi-source deep research using firecrawl and exa MCPs. Searches the web, synthesizes findings, and delivers cited reports with source attribution. Use when the user wants thorough research on any topic with evidence and citations.

global
origin:ECC
New~1.2k
v1.2Saved Jul 14, 2026

Deep Research

Drift-prone skill. Firecrawl/Exa MCP tool names, quotas, and result shapes change. Verify the configured MCP tools and current API docs before promising coverage or quoting live source counts.

Produce thorough, cited research reports from multiple web sources using firecrawl and exa MCP tools.

When to Activate

  • User asks to research any topic in depth
  • Competitive analysis, technology evaluation, or market sizing
  • Due diligence on companies, investors, or technologies
  • Any question requiring synthesis from multiple sources
  • User says "research", "deep dive", "investigate", or "what's the current state of"

MCP Requirements

At least one of:

  • firecrawlfirecrawl_search, firecrawl_scrape, firecrawl_crawl
  • exaweb_search_exa, web_search_advanced_exa, crawling_exa

Both together give the best coverage. Configure in ~/.claude.json or ~/.codex/config.toml.

Workflow

Step 1: Understand the Goal

Ask 1-2 quick clarifying questions:

  • "What's your goal — learning, making a decision, or writing something?"
  • "Any specific angle or depth you want?"

If the user says "just research it" — skip ahead with reasonable defaults.

Step 2: Plan the Research

Break the topic into 3-5 research sub-questions. Example:

  • Topic: "Impact of AI on healthcare"
    • What are the main AI applications in healthcare today?
    • What clinical outcomes have been measured?
    • What are the regulatory challenges?
    • What companies are leading this space?
    • What's the market size and growth trajectory?

For EACH sub-question, search using available MCP tools:

With firecrawl:

firecrawl_search(query: "<sub-question keywords>", limit: 8)

With exa:

web_search_exa(query: "<sub-question keywords>", numResults: 8)
web_search_advanced_exa(query: "<keywords>", numResults: 5, startPublishedDate: "2025-01-01")

Search strategy:

  • Use 2-3 different keyword variations per sub-question
  • Mix general and news-focused queries
  • Aim for 15-30 unique sources total
  • Prioritize: academic, official, reputable news > blogs > forums

Step 4: Deep-Read Key Sources

For the most promising URLs, fetch full content:

With firecrawl:

firecrawl_scrape(url: "<url>")

With exa:

crawling_exa(url: "<url>", tokensNum: 5000)

Read 3-5 key sources in full for depth. Do not rely only on search snippets.

Step 5: Synthesize and Write Report

Structure the report:

# [Topic]: Research Report
*Generated: [date] | Sources: [N] | Confidence: [High/Medium/Low]*

## Executive Summary
[3-5 sentence overview of key findings]

## 1. [First Major Theme]
[Findings with inline citations]
- Key point ([Source Name](url))
- Supporting data ([Source Name](url))

## 2. [Second Major Theme]
...

## 3. [Third Major Theme]
...

## Key Takeaways
- [Actionable insight 1]
- [Actionable insight 2]
- [Actionable insight 3]

## Sources
1. [Title](url) — [one-line summary]
2. ...

## Methodology
Searched [N] queries across web and news. Analyzed [M] sources.
Sub-questions investigated: [list]

Step 6: Deliver

  • Short topics: Post the full report in chat
  • Long reports: Post the executive summary + key takeaways, save full report to a file

Parallel Research with Subagents

For broad topics, use Claude Code's Task tool to parallelize:

Launch 3 research agents in parallel:
1. Agent 1: Research sub-questions 1-2
2. Agent 2: Research sub-questions 3-4
3. Agent 3: Research sub-question 5 + cross-cutting themes

Each agent searches, reads sources, and returns findings. The main session synthesizes into the final report.

Quality Rules

  1. Every claim needs a source. No unsourced assertions.
  2. Cross-reference. If only one source says it, flag it as unverified.
  3. Recency matters. Prefer sources from the last 12 months.
  4. Acknowledge gaps. If you couldn't find good info on a sub-question, say so.
  5. No hallucination. If you don't know, say "insufficient data found."
  6. Separate fact from inference. Label estimates, projections, and opinions clearly.

Examples

"Research the current state of nuclear fusion energy"
"Deep dive into Rust vs Go for backend services in 2026"
"Research the best strategies for bootstrapping a SaaS business"
"What's happening with the US housing market right now?"
"Investigate the competitive landscape for AI code editors"
Files1
1 files · 1.0 KB

Select a file to preview

Overall Score

82/100

Grade

B

Good

Safety

85

Quality

84

Clarity

86

Completeness

73

Summary

This skill guides agents to conduct thorough, cited research reports across multiple web sources using firecrawl and exa MCPs. It breaks topics into sub-questions, executes multi-source searches, deep-reads key sources, and synthesizes findings into a structured report with source attribution and quality controls built in.

Detected Capabilities

web search via MCP (firecrawl_search, web_search_exa)web scraping via MCP (firecrawl_scrape, crawling_exa)text synthesis and report generationparallel task execution (subagent coordination)file output/save

Trigger Keywords

Phrases that MCP clients use to match this skill to user intent.

deep researchcompetitive analysisdue diligencemarket researchinvestigate technologysynthesize sourcescurrent state analysis

Use Cases

  • Competitive analysis and technology evaluation
  • Due diligence research on companies or technologies
  • Market sizing and industry landscape analysis
  • Deep-dive investigation into current events or trends
  • Synthesis of research findings with evidence-based citations

Quality Notes

  • Excellent structure: clear activation criteria, workflow steps with examples, quality rules enforced
  • Strong quality controls: every claim requires a source, cross-reference validation, recency preferences, gap acknowledgment
  • Drift warning upfront — acknowledges MCP tool/quota volatility and recommends verification
  • Good UX: asks clarifying questions upfront, supports both short/long report delivery
  • Concrete examples provided for activation and output format
  • Potential gap: does not document fallback behavior if neither firecrawl nor exa is available, or if both tools are partially unavailable
Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001Analyzed: Jul 14, 2026

Reviews

Add this skill to your library to leave a review.

No reviews yet

Be the first to share your experience.

Version History

v1.2

Content updated

2026-07-14

Latest
v1.1

Content updated

2026-04-20

v1.0

Seeded from github.com/affaan-m/everything-claude-code

2026-03-16

Use affaan-m/deep-research in your dev environment

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...